Re: How to hot swap an SCA SCSI disk with NetBSD

2013-10-24 Thread Mouse
> What is the specific sequence of NetBSD commands to execute in order to succ$ It depends on the hardware. If the hardware is hot-swap, then I'd just unmount (or whatever), scsictl detach, unplug, replug, scsictl scan, remount (or whatever). If the hardware is not hot-swap, it's iffier; you pre

How to hot swap an SCA SCSI disk with NetBSD

2013-10-24 Thread Erik Fair
What is the specific sequence of NetBSD commands to execute in order to successfully hot swap an SCA SCSI drive? Obviously, umount(8), maybe scsictl(8) for stopping the disk ... Please specifically discuss issues relating to differing disklabels, both on-disk and in-kernel. Our documentation s

Re: Lua in-kernel (lbuf library)

2013-10-24 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 19.10.13 00:51, schrieb John Nemeth: > } kern.lua.autoload is a safety barrier. One may wish not allow any lua kernel > } script to load any given lua kernel module. > > The lua(4) implementers can certainly do this if they want. > However, module_autoload() won't be looking at this flag

Re: Lua in-kernel (lbuf library)

2013-10-24 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 21.10.13 00:05, schrieb Christoph Badura: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:01:29PM -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote: >>> Also, having to switch mentally between zero-based arrays in the kernel C >>> code and 1-based arrays in the Lua code make my head ache. >> It's something that doesn't bug me so

Re: Moving Lua source codes

2013-10-24 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 21.10.13 07:57, schrieb Artem Falcon: [...] > Doing w/o a diff, i don't have a sane mail environment now to send it inline. > > There's few more things. > First: you forgot to add MODULE_CLASS_LUA_BINDING to a > sys/sys/module.h. FWIW, I removed the MODULE_CLASS_LUA_BINDING and use the exist

Re: Moving Lua source codes

2013-10-24 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 21.10.13 21:22, schrieb Alexander Nasonov: > Marc Balmer wrote: >> Yes, this is an issue. Dunno if we need a 'kluac' or so, at the moment >> I'd say loading code from source form is ok. > > Supporting binary chunks is more challenging because binary format can > change completely in a new Lua

Re: Status of ext3fs in NetBSD?

2013-10-24 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:03:16PM -0400, Jeff Read wrote: > I was wondering if anyone was still actively working on ext3fs support > in NetBSD. I noticed it listed in the projects page and wanted to > synchronize my own extNfs efforts with anything currently ongoing. To my knowledge nobody is