Re: RFC: IRQ affinity (aka interrupt routing)

2014-08-27 Thread Kengo NAKAHARA
Hi, (2014/08/27 15:50), Matt Thomas wrote: On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:16 PM, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote: It seems good, except return value. IRQ affinity may fail (e.g. when all cpus are set "nointr" flag), so return value should not be void. then we should have a kcpuset_interruptable which is kcpu

Re: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-27 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:40:25PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote: >How about the attached patch? I've been sitting on this for months. Both changes seem fine, but the board does not behave as told by Linux crowd. At 0xe6 is a nul value where we should have 0x22, and attemps to change it does