Hi,
On 2015/05/13 10:34, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On May 13, 9:03am, k-nakah...@iij.ad.jp (Kengo NAKAHARA) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: change MSI/MSI-X APIs
>
> | > http://www.netbsd.org/~christos/if_wm-example.diff
> | > [I have not even tried to compile this, just some thoughts]
> |
> | That
On May 13, 9:03am, k-nakah...@iij.ad.jp (Kengo NAKAHARA) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: change MSI/MSI-X APIs
| > http://www.netbsd.org/~christos/if_wm-example.diff
| > [I have not even tried to compile this, just some thoughts]
|
| That URL is not available. Is the same name file directly under
Hi,
On 2015/05/12 23:37, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <55516416.3050...@iij.ad.jp> you write:
>> Here is the example code of if_wm:
>>http://www.netbsd.org/~knakahara/unify-msi-apis/if_wm-example.diff
>>
>> This diff includes pci_intr_disestablish()/pci_intr_release() and
>> pci_{intx,m
> From: tech-kern-ow...@netbsd.org [mailto:tech-kern-ow...@netbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Kengo NAKAHARA
>
> Hi
>
> On 2015/05/11 23:18, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > Can't we have a:
> >
> > int pci_intr_map(struct pci_attach_args *pa, pci_intr_handle_t *ih);
> >
> > for the drivers that have only
Hi
On 2015/05/11 23:18, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <555048fd.6020...@iij.ad.jp>,
> Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
>> I received feedback from some device driver authors. They point out
>> establish, disestablish and release APIs should be unified for INTx,
>> MSI and MSI-X. So, I would change th
