On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, David Holland wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:41:18PM +, David Holland wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:05:25PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> > > One final attempt to summarize the objections that have be
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>>
>>I have tried to explain the need of kctors, instead of hardcoded
>>sequence of xxx_init() functions in init_main.c:main(), generated by
>>dependency.
>
> We need both constructors to handle de
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:41:00 +0800 (PHT)
From: Paul Goyette
Is there a good reason to continue to include wapbl.h in the lfs source
files? As far as I can see, nothing in lfs uses any of the macros or
structs that are defined in wapbl.h; other than the #include lines, the
on
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Josue Hernandez wrote:
> I want to know the status of this project, is there already someone
> working with it?
I started working on it last year, but then life got in the way. I have
some free time again now, so would be happy to work on it with you.
Other
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:37:05PM -0600, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a patch that should enable PCI MSI for pci(4)-attached re(4)
> NICs. I would like both review of the code, and additional testing.
>
> I've tested it successfully on amd64 -current with a
> 8100E/8101E/81
Hello
I want to know the status of this project,
is there already someone working with it?
I think working this I can explore the code of the kernel
and help with the project.
thank you and best regards!
Josue David Hernandez
