On 12/02/2016 08:34, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse wrote:
>>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon.
>>
>> How would this vether differ from the existing tap? Presumably I'm
>> just missing something
>
>
2016/02/11 2:36 "Taylor R Campbell" :
>
>Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:56:46 +0900
>From: Ryota Ozaki
>
>Thanks to introducing softint-based if_input,
>we can simplify bridge(4).
>
> Awesome! I love patches that have loads
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse wrote:
>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon.
>
> How would this vether differ from the existing tap? Presumably I'm
> just missing something
dhcpcd didn't work well with bridge(4) and tap(4)
Hi riastradh@n.o
On 2016/02/11 3:01, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:20:15 +0900
>From: Kengo NAKAHARA
>
>I tried to use passive reference for a encaptab list itself instead of
>pserialize_read_enter().
># As you know, packet
Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse wrote:
>>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon.
>>
>> How would this vether differ from the existing tap? Presumably I'm
>> just missing something
>
>dhcpcd didn't work well
On Feb 12, 10:33am, Roy Marples wrote:
} On 12/02/2016 08:34, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
} > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse wrote:
} >>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon.
} >>
} >> How would this vether differ from the existing tap?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:19:14 +0900
From: Kengo NAKAHARA
I implement gif(4) softint fix code suggested by your design using
passive reference. Here is the patch include your passive reference
implement(with tiny fixes).
> tap(4) is a direct interface between userland and the network.
Well, where "the network" refers to the Ethernet stack and higher
layers within the kernel, not to any real networking medium.
> vether(4) would not be (although you could use BPF, etc.). It would
> be an ethernet device that
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:17:31AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> On Feb 12, 10:33am, Roy Marples wrote:
> } On 12/02/2016 08:34, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> } > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse wrote:
> } >>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon.