On Sat, 24 Sep 2016, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:02:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Shouldn't the vioif(4) device be more properly named if_vio(4), to be
consistent with other network interfaces?
I think the code was imported with the same filenames as its original
s
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:01 AM, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:51:32PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > > *if you have the write cache disabled*
> > >
> > > *Running with the write cache enabled is a bad idea*
> >
> > On ATA devices, you can't permanently disable the writ
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:02:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Shouldn't the vioif(4) device be more properly named if_vio(4), to be
> consistent with other network interfaces?
I think the code was imported with the same filenames as its original
source, to ease merging of updates.
> With its cu
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:02:26PM +, paul.kon...@dell.com wrote:
>
> > On Sep 23, 2016, at 5:49 AM, Edgar Fu?? wrote:
> >
> >> The whole point of tagged queueing is to let you *not* set [the write
> >> cache] bit in the mode pages and still get good performance.
> > I don't get that. My un
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:51:32PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > *if you have the write cache disabled*
> >
> > *Running with the write cache enabled is a bad idea*
>
> On ATA devices, you can't permanently disable the write cache. You have
> to do it on every power cycles.
There are a
