On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 06:30:31PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> I have some plans to implement kernel aslr on amd64.
For what purpose? It has been shown over and over again that ASLR simply
doesn't work in a lot of situations in userland. The situation for
kernel ASLR is significantly worse.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 08:39:51PM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> bou...@antioche.eu.org (Manuel Bouyer) writes:
>
> >Hello,
> >on a netbsd-6 host, I got this:
> >panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "bp->b_bcount <= todo" failed: file
> >"/home/bouyer/src-6/src/sys/kern/kern_physio.c", line 176
bou...@antioche.eu.org (Manuel Bouyer) writes:
>Hello,
>on a netbsd-6 host, I got this:
>panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "bp->b_bcount <= todo" failed: file
>"/home/bouyer/src-6/src/sys/kern/kern_physio.c", line 176
Does the disklabel show the correct block size for the filesystem?
--
--
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:09:08PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > The mremap() dance is only desirable for multi-threaded JIT. If you
> > compile a module at a time before making it visible, just a plain
> > mprotect is
