On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:17 PM Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Is it viable to get merged the Hyper-V support for NetBSD-9?
I'd like to merge it to NetBSD 9.
I'm working on moving Hyper-V releated drivers to sys/dev/hyperv from
sys/arch/x86.
--
Kimihiro Nonaka
On 2019/02/13 21:13, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article ,
Rin Okuyama wrote:
Hi,
On 2019/02/13 6:07, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Hi,
As Martin pointed out, it is useful for debugging to turn on
DIAGNOSTIC for modules (for non-release branches).
Now, all
In article ,
Rin Okuyama wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 2019/02/13 6:07, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Rin Okuyama wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As Martin pointed out, it is useful for debugging to turn on
>>> DIAGNOSTIC for modules (for non-release branches).
>>>
>>> Now, all modules for amd64
On 2019/02/13 19:06, Paul Goyette wrote:
I would also wonder if we could increase the WARNS?= level from 3 to 5 (to
match the current WARNS?= level used for kernel builds). Has anyone tried to
see how many modules would fail with WARNS?=5 ??
Thank you for your comment.
Well, I examined
I would also wonder if we could increase the WARNS?= level from 3 to 5 (to
match the current WARNS?= level used for kernel builds). Has anyone tried
to see how many modules would fail with WARNS?=5 ??
Thank you for your comment.
Well, I examined that (both for GCC7 & clang). Among ~ 360
Hi,
On 2019/02/13 3:54, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 12/02/2019 16:02, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Hi,
The system freezes indefinitely with xhci(4) or ehci(4), when NIC with
multiple outstanding transfers [axen(4), mue(4), and ure(4)] is stopped
by "ifconfig down" or detached.
As discussed in the previous
