Emulating linux timer.. syscalls

2020-07-10 Thread SHAIKH AYEED
Hello Sir, Well, I was very much interested to start with this project could you please guide me with some more details to start with. Regards AYEED SHAIKH -- To know more on us, Please click on any of the following links;

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Mouse
>> [...] I'd be astonished if there aren't at least a few programs >> [in pkgsrc] that grub around in things like this. > No question, there are, but this particular field seems very unlikely > to have any users - really really unlikely. Especially since, come to think of it, the value is incorrec

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <27763.1594388...@jinx.noi.kre.to>, Robert Elz wrote: >Date:Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:23:19 - (UTC) >From:mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) >Message-ID: > >I have spent a little time looking at this now, and I think >it is just all a mess. > > | pg_jobc

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:47:28 +0200 From:Rhialto Message-ID: <20200710144728.gy3...@falu.nl> | It also seems to be involved in deciding wether to send a SIGTTOU or | SIGTTIN to a process Ah, right, thanks ... when I was reviewing uses in the kernel I was concent

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Mouse
>> It seems to me that if pg_jobc is exported, someone presumably once >> cared and there's thus a decent chance someone still cares. > Really? I'd have thought it more likely, given the context, that > "it can be obtained via /dev/kmem" -> "it can be fetched via libkvm" > -> "it can be fetched v

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:54:25 -0400 (EDT) From:Mouse Message-ID: <202007101354.jaa16...@stone.rodents-montreal.org> | > I see 3 ways forward... | | I count 4, but maybe kre is counting two of them as subclasses of a | single one. Maybe, no-one said I could c

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Rhialto
On Fri 10 Jul 2020 at 20:41:40 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > As best I can work out, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, > the whole purpose of pg_jobc is so that orphanpg() can be called > when a process group is orphaned (no longer has a session leader). > > If it has any other use, I cannot see i

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 10.07.2020 15:41, Robert Elz wrote: > Unfortunately > I have no idea what "qualifying pgrp for job control" is supposed to mean. The Design and implementation of 4.4book phrases it as: number of processes with parent controlling terminal. Unfortunately the book does not explain whether pg_jobc

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Mouse
> [... pg_jobc ...] > I see 3 ways forward... I count 4, but maybe kre is counting two of them as subclasses of a single one. > simply drop the KASSERT the way that FreeBSD have done, and let > things return to the semi-broken but rarely bothersome code that was > there before. > Or, we could p

Re: pg_jobc going negative?

2020-07-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:23:19 - (UTC) From:mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) Message-ID: I have spent a little time looking at this now, and I think it is just all a mess. | pg_jobc is not a reference counter. Maybe not technically a "reference" counter, a