On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:41:40PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> I have spent a little time looking at this now, and I think
> it is just all a mess.
Indeed...
> As best I can work out, and someone correct me if I'm wrong,
> the whole purpose of pg_jobc is so that orphanpg() can be called
>
Just to get back to the original subject - fully support {} around single
statements - have been doing that in my own code for ages.
Would be great to have that codified (ha!)
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 12:01, Rhialto wrote:
> On Thu 16 Jul 2020 at 13:08:49 -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > It sounds