On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 07:57:26PM -0400, Terry Moore wrote:
> >> I would say so, especially since that would mean the child's parent is
> >> no longer the process that forked it (which could break other use
> >> cases).
> >
> > That depends on how you implement detaching, but I suppose
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:02:09PM -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> > > Sounds like there is an in interesting fuzzing project in there for
> > > someone - make a filesystem mage and the repeatedly damage it, then
> > > see if fsck can fix it, then if you get a rump
>>> By the way, I'm not so familiar to sparc.
>>> audioamd(4) has many assembly code (though they look very old stuff).
>> [...] I see no assembly code in arch/sparc/dev/audioamd* on 5.2 [...]
> It's in sparc/sparc/amd7930intr.s.
Ah!
Personally, I would be inclined to preserve that. It handles
> > By the way, I'm not so familiar to sparc.
> > audioamd(4) has many assembly code (though they look very old stuff).
>
> For what it's worth...I don't know what "very old" means to you, but I
> see no assembly code in arch/sparc/dev/audioamd* on 5.2 (the .c
> datestamped 2010, the .h, 2005).
> By the way, I'm not so familiar to sparc.
> audioamd(4) has many assembly code (though they look very old stuff).
For what it's worth...I don't know what "very old" means to you, but I
see no assembly code in arch/sparc/dev/audioamd* on 5.2 (the .c
datestamped 2010, the .h, 2005).
/~\ The
I have improved am7930 family audio drivers to share more code among
them: audioamd(4) on sparc, vsaudio(4) on vax, and bba(4).
The patch is: http://www.netbsd.org/~isaki/20200904-am7930.diff
vsaudio(4) and bba(4) were tested by naru@, tsutsui@. Both worked
fine. (thanks!)
By the way, I'm not
