On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:45:59PM -0700, Chris Hanson wrote:
> Also, exactly what form will posix_spawn chdir support take in your project?
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly.
There is an upcoming change for the next version of Posix in the Austin
Group's bug tracker and the
Also any reason to use 9.1 instead of 9.2 or 9.2_STABLE?
(Not that I think it would make a difference for azalia)
Martin
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
But if azalia is not supported anymore because it crashes the
kernel, shouldn't it be removed and not simply be commented out?
I think that your message is the first indication that azalia(4)
is slowly bit-rotting...
-RVP
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since
it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support
since it's here and 7.1.1 has no problem with it).
You must've compiled a custom kernel. 9.1 GENERIC
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:47:30PM +, RVP wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> >The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since
> >it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support
> >since it's here and 7.1.1 has no
Also, exactly what form will posix_spawn chdir support take in your project?
Have you provided an implementation plan somewhere? I read the first blogpost
as more of a rationale than a plan.
— Chris
On Jun 25, 2021, at 8:33 AM, Piyush Sachdeva
wrote:
>
> In the matter of organising my repository (pointed out by Christos Zoulas),
> I have mirrored The NetBSD source in my github repository as a separate
> branch.
> However, I am using a main branch as a staging area for the TNF mirror,
>
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, RVP wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
But if azalia is not supported anymore because it crashes the
kernel, shouldn't it be removed and not simply be commented out?
I think that your message is the first indication that azalia(4)
is slowly
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:17 PM Piyush Sachdeva
wrote:
>
> >Progress Update 1 (Week 2)-
> >Contrary to the timeline provided, I started working within the user-land.
> >(src/lib/libc/gen/posix_spawn_fileactions.c, src/include/spawn.h,
> >src/sys/sys/spawn.h
> >The modifications made to the files
On 25/06/2021 12:10, nia wrote:
hi tech-kern,
The uscanner driver only exists for compatibility with userspace Linux
software that uses an interface that was already deprecated by Linux
in 2004. All scanner software these days uses ugen.
I think we should remove this driver in case someone
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 4:10 AM, nia wrote:
>
> hi tech-kern,
>
> The uscanner driver only exists for compatibility with userspace Linux
> software that uses an interface that was already deprecated by Linux
> in 2004. All scanner software these days uses ugen.
>
> I think we should remove
Hello,
I was trying to update a server, running a NetBSD 7.1.1 (amd64) to
NetBSD 9.1.
The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since
it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support
since it's here and 7.1.1 has no problem with it).
It's a
hi tech-kern,
The uscanner driver only exists for compatibility with userspace Linux
software that uses an interface that was already deprecated by Linux
in 2004. All scanner software these days uses ugen.
I think we should remove this driver in case someone mistakenly
enables it thinking it
13 matches
Mail list logo
