On 28/02/23 19:05, Michael van Elst wrote:
That's the truncate operation where things fail. Somewhere
the NFS call must be different. Please dump the full RPC
call and reply.
linux->netbsd10
09:45:24.673875 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40711, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 264)
On 8/08/22 21:37, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Does anyone use a Dell PERC H730P or similar RAID controller in RAID mode?
I have several NetBSD systems with PERC H730P's
mfii(4) says all configuration is done via the controller's BIOS.
Does that mean I need to shut down in case a drive fails an I
I have a machine with a Dell PERC H750 raid card. I'd like to get it
working under NetBSD.
When FreeBSD added support to their driver (mrsas) it looks like they
did it with these three patches:
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys/dev/mrsas?id=2909aab4cfc296bcf83fa3e87ed41ed1f4244fea
A few weeks ago there was some discussion here and in ticket 54147 about
the amount of system memory being calculated incorrectly (for at least
some machines) when doing a UEFI boot, but no solution was determined.
If anyone has any ideas I can test them on the machine of ours that is
exhibiting
On 2/05/19 5:51 pm, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On the other hand, the types are mapped to a few BIOS memory types
> before combination. Even this map should shrink that way to only
> a few entries unless the stripped parts vary a lot between "available"
> and "reserved" or contain lots of
On 1/05/19 9:06 pm, Michael van Elst wrote:
> efiboot has a 'memmap' command that tells you what memory is
> reported by UEFI. Maybe that helps to find out where the memory
> goes missing.
If it helps someone this is what it reported:
/0fff available
Hi,
I have a new Dell PowerEdge 440 that I was installing a few month old
8.0_STABLE on. For the first time I tried setting it up as a UEFI
system and everything seems to have worked OK _except_ that it seems to
be significantly under-reporting the amount of physical memory - the
system has
I have a Dell PERC H810 pcie card and an external disk array attached
to it. If I put this into a desktop 6.1_STABLE/amd64 system I can
happily read and write terabytes from the external array. However if
I move the card to a Dell poweredge r610 (which also has an internal
PERC 6/i) and try
Hi,
back in Jan 2012 there was some discussion about ffsv2 extattr
support initiated by Manuel Bouyer. What is the current state of
that? Is there anything in Current?
cheers
mark
On Mon, 05 May 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
I wrote:
So can someone suggest where exactly the patch should go. And
isn't proc_lock held at this point (entered at line 344, exit at
line 569)?
How about this?
Seems good to me and can confirm that its fixed the increasing proc
count
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:18:10 David Laight wrote:
To fix, this should be added somewhere, probably at
sys/kern/kern_exit.c:487 (but I'm not sure if there's a better
location):
if ((l-l_pflag LP_PIDLID) != 0 l-l_lid != p-p_pid) {
proc_free_pid(l-l_lid);
On Thursday 27 March 2014 14:00:37 I wrote:
So what resource could this be running out of?
Coming back to this, looks like nprocs isn't being incremented/decremented
properly in some circumstances:
test# cat HelloWorld.java
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String[]
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, you wrote:
I completely missed the mpii driver. I'll order the card in the
morning and see how it goes.
Just to close this off: plugged the card in, mpii found it and the
tape drive is there as st0 so all looks good.
cheers
mark
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 20:46:17 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I found this:
https://www.ascent.co.nz/productspecification.aspx?ItemID=413461
but that seems to use the mps driver on FreeBSD and NetBSD doesn't
have it. Any guess on how hard it would be to port?
Hopefully it's supported by
Are SAS tape drives supported in NetBSD?
I have an LSI MegaRAID SAS card with an HP LTO5 SAS drive attached.
The card's WebBIOS can see the tape attached and NetBSD can see the
LSI card but NetBSD show no evidence of seeing the tape drive (not
even as an unconfigured device).
cheers
mark
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
Last time I fiddled around with the LSI MegaRAID stack it did not
provide any sort of transparent access to attached devices. Can
you create a LUN with the tape device?
You might have more success with the LSI MPT stack. That at least
provides
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Lars Heidieker wrote:
I think the pagescanner can't keep up with the speed, is there any
change in network bandwidth between those machines?
The two ftp servers are both gigabit connected to the same switch and
its gigabit all the way to the clients.
Another idea, the
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Mark Davies wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Lars Heidieker wrote:
Can you see which kernel thread causes high CPU usage by showing
lwps in top? (t toggles those modes)
149 threads: 25 idle, 118 sleeping, 6 on CPU
Memory: 15G Act, 15M Wired, 28M Exec, 15G File, 4620K Free
On Thursday 19 September 2013 20:36:49 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
the file cache shouldn't be allowed to use that much memory.
What are your vm.* settings (sysctl vm) ?
They are the default settings from GENERIC, I haven't explicitly set
anything.
vm.loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00
vm.maxslp = 20
vm.uspace
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 23:03:58 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I just processed this one; rebuilding the netbsd-5 branch should be
enough (unfortunably the TNF build cluster producing binary snapshots is
down at this time and needs physical presence, we hope it will be back
up today or tomorow).
I
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:09:01PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
i think you have the problem fixed by this pullup (not yet
processed):
http://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/req-5.cgi?show=1439
I just processed this one;
Just to confirm that this
21 matches
Mail list logo
