On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 02:57:47PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
>>> To wit: as far as I can tell, having been wading around in that code
>>> recently, the only problem with what we have is that if the path
>>> sent back by namei isn't absolute it needs a getcwd() stuck on the
>>> front of it.
>
>
>> To wit: as far as I can tell, having been wading around in that code
>> recently, the only problem with what we have is that if the path
>> sent back by namei isn't absolute it needs a getcwd() stuck on the
>> front of it.
>> Is it reasonable to just do that?
I don't think so. It would be a r
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:40:57AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:40:19AM +, David Holland wrote:
> >> Wish we had working $ORIGIN...
> >
> > We will fairly soon, I think... :-)
>
> To wit: as far as I can tell, having been wading around in that code
> recently, t
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:05:45AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | For the time being what we can do is take the path sent back from
> | namei, and if it's not absolute call getcwd and graft that onto the
> | front. This will in general yield a partially realpath'd path but I
> | don't think
On Apr 22, 5:02am, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: $ORIGIN (was: Re: make: ensure ${.MAKE} works)
| I had convinced myself it was supposed to fail if it had to look
| outside the cache, but that's only true for the first step.
Correct. Or if someone remov
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:22:12PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | If you exec "../bin/foo", that's all namei will resolve or touch, and
> | that's the string that'll come back from namei. If we want an absolute
> | path out, it needs getcwd, either in exec or in namei... and in exec
> | is p
On Apr 21, 3:41pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: $ORIGIN (was: Re: make: ensure ${.MAKE} works)
| On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:58:31AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > | Is it reasonable to just do that? I don't think calling getcwd() from
| > | ex
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:58:31AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | Is it reasonable to just do that? I don't think calling getcwd() from
> | exec is going to cause locking problems, but it might be more overhead
> | than we want to swallow.
>
> The code that we have there works fine now, ya
On Apr 21, 5:40am, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: $ORIGIN (was: Re: make: ensure ${.MAKE} works)
| On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:40:19AM +, David Holland wrote:
| >> Wish we had working $ORIGIN...
| >
| > We will fairly soon, I think... :-)
|
| To
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:40:19AM +, David Holland wrote:
>> Wish we had working $ORIGIN...
>
> We will fairly soon, I think... :-)
To wit: as far as I can tell, having been wading around in that code
recently, the only problem with what we have is that if the path sent
back by namei isn'
10 matches
Mail list logo
