re: History of disklables

2017-01-03 Thread matthew green
> Do our VAX disk drivers for Unibus/Massbus hardware retain the compiled > in partitioning as a fallback? Without it, it'd be tough to even read > old Unix filesystems without modifying the disk contents (to write either > an Ultrix or 4.4BSD label into place). dkctl(8) in modern netbsd would

Re: History of disklables

2016-12-31 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:14:36PM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote: > > You must be misremembering something. > Looks like it. > > So disklables are a BSD thing, not a DEC thing? Ultrix has a disklabel format, and I've moved drives from VAX to MIPS Ultrix systems, so the answer really is "it depends". I

Re: History of disklables

2016-12-28 Thread Johnny Billquist
On 2016-12-28 20:14, Edgar Fuß wrote: You must be misremembering something. Looks like it. So disklables are a BSD thing, not a DEC thing? Late into this discussion but anyway... DEC did disklabels in Ultrix, which is a different implementation than the disklabels in BSD, as far as I know.

Re: History of disklables

2016-12-28 Thread Edgar Fuß
> You must be misremembering something. Looks like it. So disklables are a BSD thing, not a DEC thing?

Re: History of disklables

2016-12-28 Thread Wolfgang Solfrank
Hi Edgar, 4.3 did not have on-disk disklabels. Really? My first encounter with BSD was ~1983 on a VAX 11/750 which switched between VMS and 4.2BSD (or 4.3, definitely not 4.4) every other day and I think it had two disc packs with different partition layouts. I also remember ws@ (who was