On Aug,Monday 2 2010, at 4:27 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, John Nemeth wrote:
>
>>I'm thinking the acquisition of module_lock should be pushed into
>> module_autoload() instead of having the caller acquire it for this very
>> reason. It makes it hard to change the way locki
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Adam Hamsik wrote:
On Aug,Monday 2 2010, at 4:27 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, John Nemeth wrote:
I'm thinking the acquisition of module_lock should be pushed into
module_autoload() instead of having the caller acquire it for this very
reason. It makes
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, John Nemeth wrote:
I'm thinking the acquisition of module_lock should be pushed into
module_autoload() instead of having the caller acquire it for this very
reason. It makes it hard to change the way locking works in the
MODULAR code if you expect the caller to acquire t
