Mindaugas, thank you very much for your hard work!!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:16:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right?
That was the initial driver for me anyway.
Now that this work is in, there are some changes that can be built upon it
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Andrew Doran wrote:
Mindaugas, thank you very much for your hard work!!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:16:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right?
That was the initial driver for me anyway.
Now that this
hi,
Mindaugas, thank you very much for your hard work!!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:16:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right?
That was the initial driver for me anyway.
Now that this work is in, there are some changes that can be
hi,
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Andrew Doran wrote:
Mindaugas, thank you very much for your hard work!!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:16:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right?
That was the initial driver for me anyway.
Now that
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right?
is the new locking protocol documented anywhere?
Right, object associated with the page (UVM object or anon). That can
be asserted by pmaps using a new uvm_page_locked_p()
hi,
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The
technical objectives of the branch are described here:
http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/doc/BRANCHES?r=1.307#488
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The
technical objectives of the branch are described here:
http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/doc/BRANCHES?r=1.307#488
the idea is to protect pv chains with object lock, right
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The technical
objectives of the branch are described here:
[ .. ]
i will be very glad when this change is merged!
thanks for all your work on it.
.mrg.
On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:15:36 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius rm...@netbsd.org wrote:
Hello,
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The technical
objectives of the branch are described here:
http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/doc/BRANCHES?r=1.307#488
This results
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:15:36PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The technical
objectives of the branch are described here:
Indeed, and as usual, extraordinary work!
- Jukka.
Hello,
Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The technical
objectives of the branch are described here:
http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/doc/BRANCHES?r=1.307#488
This results in:
- Rewritten x86 TLB handler, which is simpler and cleaner C code.
- UVM provides extra
11 matches
Mail list logo
