At 20:41 Uhr +0100 05.03.2012, Edgar Fuß wrote:
[I'll third the request for sane line lengths, for mail readers as well as
for customers like the gnats db]
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that
that depends on how you measure users
Well...people whose home directories reside on that file server.
hello. I've been using NetBSD in server environments, including file
server environments, for 15 years. To me, the fact that you're still
running NetBSD-4 aand you've been able to get everything back in working
order after a series of unfortunate events, presumably after the machine
has
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
everybody else does.
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using NetBSD to
operate a file server on a scale comparable to or
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:41:39PM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64)
file server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using
that other OS everybody else does.
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using NetBSD to ope$
Please don't use paragraph-length lines.
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using
NetBSD to operate a file server on a scale comparable to or larger
than ours, i.e. ~200 users, ~1TB storage?
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:41:39PM +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
everybody else does.
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is
Am 05.03.12 20:41, schrieb Edgar Fuß:
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
everybody else does.
You sureley mean an up-to-date version of NetBSD, right? btw, if you
would fold