Le Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 05:23:00PM +, Taylor R Campbell a écrit :
> > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 16:44:08 +0100
> > From: tlaro...@polynum.com
> >
> > I will look (silently) to dev/pci/radeonfb.c to understand better the
> > logics and try to find if there is a way to obtain a better console
> >
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 16:44:08 +0100
> From: tlaro...@polynum.com
>
> I will look (silently) to dev/pci/radeonfb.c to understand better the
> logics and try to find if there is a way to obtain a better console
> display.
FYI, dev/pci/radeonfb.c is the legacy radeon framebuffer driver only
for
Le Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 03:59:45PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> Le Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 02:54:39PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> > Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> > >
> > > Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node
67 is a refresh-rate, not a depth
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
production). Only kernel and modules (not userland); and kernel is not
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
>
> Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
> production). Only kernel and modules (not userland); and kernel is not
> GENERIC but a special config one matching the previous 9.2 config
> running on the
Le Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 02:54:39PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> >
> > Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
> > production). Only kernel and modules (not userland); and kernel is not
> >
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:33:45 +0100
> From: tlaro...@polynum.com
>
> Le Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:17:29AM +0700, Robert Elz a écrit :
> > Date:Sun, 22 Jan 2023 20:27:24 +0100
> > From:tlaro...@polynum.com
> > Message-ID:
> >
> >
> > | +Zone kernel: Available
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> [Please feel free to redirect me to another list if this is not the
> correct one for kernel beta testing]
>
> Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
> production). Only kernel and modules (not
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:17:29AM +0700, Robert Elz a écrit :
> Date:Sun, 22 Jan 2023 20:27:24 +0100
> From:tlaro...@polynum.com
> Message-ID:
>
>
> | +Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 9007199254079374 KiB
>
> I see something like that too, but while it
Hello,
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Martin Husemann a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > no data for est. mode 640x480x67
>
> [..]
>
> > I have not updated the book blocks. Is the 10.0 kernel expecting to have
> > hints about the
Date:Sun, 22 Jan 2023 20:27:24 +0100
From:tlaro...@polynum.com
Message-ID:
| +Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 9007199254079374 KiB
I see something like that too, but while it is obviously absurd,
I'm not sure that it actually does any harm (maybe) - my
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> [...]
>
> The main difference is about the framebuffer: previous kernel version
> picked the correct mode. NetBSD 10.0 does not and use "entry level"
> mode 640x480x67, resulting streched fat big characters; message:
>
>
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> no data for est. mode 640x480x67
[..]
> I have not updated the book blocks. Is the 10.0 kernel expecting to have
> hints about the modes from the bootloader i.e. a new install would
> have updated the boot blocks and I would
[Please feel free to redirect me to another list if this is not the
correct one for kernel beta testing]
Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
production). Only kernel and modules (not userland); and kernel is not
GENERIC but a special config one matching the previous 9.2
14 matches
Mail list logo
