On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Michael Plass wrote:
On Jun 9, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Michael Plass wrote:
I have a fairly recent -current image that I can try this on. I'll do that.
OK, it looks like I was wrong, it is fixed with PR/50381. I couldn't make
the problem happen on the -current image (source
On Jun 9, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Michael Plass wrote:
> I have a fairly recent -current image that I can try this on. I'll do that.
OK, it looks like I was wrong, it is fixed with PR/50381. I couldn't make
the problem happen on the -current image (source date Wed May 18 11:28:44 2016
+)
On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:59 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, co...@sdf.org wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:07:57PM -0700, Michael Plass wrote:
>>> Does this ring a bell with anybody? The only similar panic on gnats that I
>>> was able to
>>> find was closed in 2011. But I've
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, co...@sdf.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:07:57PM -0700, Michael Plass wrote:
Does this ring a bell with anybody? The only similar panic on gnats that I was
able to
find was closed in 2011. But I've had trouble finding things in gnats before.
PR/50381
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:07:57PM -0700, Michael Plass wrote:
> Does this ring a bell with anybody? The only similar panic on gnats that I
> was able to
> find was closed in 2011. But I've had trouble finding things in gnats before.
>
PR/50381
http://gnats.netbsd.org/50381
Sometimes, I use
I ran into this panic yesterday:
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "node->tn_links == 0" failed: file
"/home/michael/NetBSD-7.0/build/usr/src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_subr.c", line 261
db{3}> bt
0xb384dcec: netbsd:vpanic+0xc
0xb384dd04: netbsd:__udivmoddi4
0xb384dd3c: netbsd:tmpfs_free_node+0x1ac
