On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 01:51:42AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Anyway, currently our udl(4) doesn't require such allocation,
It's also a problem for radeondrm (no USB involved).
freebsd implemented a different fix for this, which i think involved
using the VM system directly and supporting
On 12/02/11 10:20, matthew green wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 01:51:42AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Anyway, currently our udl(4) doesn't require such allocation,
It's also a problem for radeondrm (no USB involved).
freebsd implemented a different fix for this, which i think involved
Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
acquire enough contiguous memory.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel/14431
Anyone interested in porting it or implementing something similar?
On 12/1/2011 5:33 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
acquire enough contiguous memory.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel/14431
Anyone
wiz@ wrote:
Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
acquire enough contiguous memory.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel/14431
Anyone interested in porting it or implementing
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
acquire enough contiguous memory.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel/14431
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:11:36PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
acquire enough
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 01:51:42AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Anyway, currently our udl(4) doesn't require such allocation,
It's also a problem for radeondrm (no USB involved).
Thomas