On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:18:38PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Changing memory fixed the problem. The machine now boots 6.0 i386 PAE
with SMP enabled and 128 GB of RAM installed, and it seems to be stable.
But I spoke too fast. It is stable, but the i386 PAE kernel does not
sees more than 2
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:08AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:18:38PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Changing memory fixed the problem. The machine now boots 6.0 i386 PAE
with SMP enabled and 128 GB of RAM installed, and it seems to be stable.
But I spoke too
Am 21.01.14 20:54, schrieb David Laight:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:08AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:18:38PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Changing memory fixed the problem. The machine now boots 6.0 i386 PAE
with SMP enabled and 128 GB of RAM installed, and
David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk wrote:
It might be that having 128G has confused things somewhere.
I got the same result with 64 GB.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:59:19PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Am 21.01.14 20:54, schrieb David Laight:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:08AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:18:38PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Changing memory fixed the problem. The machine now
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:27:40AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Following up on i386 PAE issues: the machine works fine with PAE and
SMP disabled (boot -1) when it has 16 GB of RAM. Attempting to add
more memory and reach 32 GB causes the unpleasant UVM crash shown
below.
Changing memory
[...] i386 PAE is inferior to amd64 [...]
The idea of i386 PAE if that if an i386 lacks some RAM, you can just
drop a PAE kernel and add memory.
Moving the system to amd64 is a bit more work.
How well do amd64-capable and PAE-capable correlate? I already
know, for exmaple, that way more
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 03:27:04AM -0500, Mouse wrote:
[...] i386 PAE is inferior to amd64 [...]
The idea of i386 PAE if that if an i386 lacks some RAM, you can just
drop a PAE kernel and add memory.
Moving the system to amd64 is a bit more work.
How well do amd64-capable and
Hi
Following up on i386 PAE issues: the machine works fine with PAE and
SMP disabled (boot -1) when it has 16 GB of RAM. Attempting to add
more memory and reach 32 GB causes the unpleasant UVM crash shown
below. Does it rings a bell for someone:
panic: lock error
cpu0: Begin traceback...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 01:16:08PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
panic: lock error
Can you try this with a LOCKDEBUG kernel?
Martin
Martin Husemann mar...@duskware.de wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 01:16:08PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
panic: lock error
Can you try this with a LOCKDEBUG kernel?
Martin
Will not help. This is a trap in x86 pmap, the locking error is just a
side effect, not an issue in UVM. Quite
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius rm...@netbsd.org wrote:
If NetBSD ships PAE,
we ought to fix its bugs, but generally - i386 PAE is inferior to amd64
in practically all aspects, so just do not use it if you can.
The idea of i386 PAE if that if an i386 lacks some RAM, you can just
drop a PAE kernel
12 matches
Mail list logo
