On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 04:42:07PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> One more question: Are you planning to change relookup to return the
>> result unlocked, too? That will enable us to get rid of some ick in
>> genfs_rename users.
>
>I have no plans to do it -- I'm not eve
On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:04:27 +0100
> From: J. Hannken-Illjes
>
> As announced some weeks ago here comes the API change to VOP_LOOKUP:
>
> Change vnode operation lookup to return the resulting vnode *vpp locked.
> Change ca
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:16:18 +0100
From: "J. Hannken-Illjes"
On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
> One more question: Are you planning to change relookup to return the
> result unlocked, too? That will enable us to get rid of some ick in
> genfs_rename us
On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:04:27 +0100
> From: J. Hannken-Illjes
>
> As announced some weeks ago here comes the API change to VOP_LOOKUP:
>
> Change vnode operation lookup to return the resulting vnode *vpp locked.
> Change ca
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:04:27 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes
As announced some weeks ago here comes the API change to VOP_LOOKUP:
Change vnode operation lookup to return the resulting vnode *vpp locked.
Change cache_lookup() to return an unlocked vnode.
One more question: Ar
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:04:27 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes
As announced some weeks ago here comes the API change to VOP_LOOKUP:
Change vnode operation lookup to return the resulting vnode *vpp locked.
Change cache_lookup() to return an unlocked vnode.
Sounds like the right
As announced some weeks ago here comes the API change to VOP_LOOKUP:
Change vnode operation lookup to return the resulting vnode *vpp locked.
Change cache_lookup() to return an unlocked vnode.
The fast path through the name cache doesn't add unlock/locks.
Most file systems now do this on cac
