Current support for iterating over mnt_vnodelist (the list of vnodes
attached to a specific mount point) is rudimentary. All we have is
vmark() / vunmark() to set a marker on the list. Every caller has
to care about list and vnode mutexes, reference count being zero,
intermediate vnode states
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:11:04 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
Add an interface to iterate over a vnode list:
void vfs_vnode_iterator_init(struct mount *mp, void **marker)
void vfs_vnode_iterator_destroy(void *marker)
bool
On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:11:04 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
Add an interface to iterate over a vnode list:
void vfs_vnode_iterator_init(struct mount *mp, void
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:55:16 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
/* mount.h */
struct vnode_iterator; /* opaque */
void vfs_vnode_iterator_init(struct mount
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:19:40 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
That is exactly what I was going for, except with a typed pointer
instead of a void pointer.
Please
On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:55:16 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
/* mount.h */
On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:19:40 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Taylor R Campbell
campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net wrote:
That is exactly
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:55:12PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Thomas Klausner w...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:11:04AM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
A diff implementing this and using it for those operations running
vrecycle() is at
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:20:43 +0100
From: J. Hannken-Illjes hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
New diff at http://www.netbsd.org/~hannken/vnode-pass4-3.diff
Looks good to me now, assuming all tests pass with it. (Do we have
any automatic tests for ffs_reload c.?)
The lfs changes look suspect --
