On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 07:43:32AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> >> | else plumbs it through either, but I'll go ahead and do so.
> >>
> >> Please do. What other things don't permit fcntl() to work? We
> >> should fix any of those.
> >
> > Well, I?ll fix these 2 anyway.
>
> ?and
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 4:59 PM, John Nemeth wrote:
>
> Nice. timerfd(2) is Asterisk's preferred timing source. This
> should improve our support for Asterisk. As you might guess, I'm
> all for the addition of these.
Yes, I remember you mentioning that before, and I just double-checked
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 3:54 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>>
>> | else plumbs it through either, but I'll go ahead and do so.
>>
>> Please do. What other things don't permit fcntl() to work? We
>> should fix any of those.
>
> Well, I’ll fix these 2 anyway.
…and I just double-checked
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 6:26 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>> On Sep 18, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>>
>> | You'll get EBADF if you try it on anything else
>>
>> and that's definitely wrong, on a pipe the system is allowed to return
>> EINVAL,
>> and that's what ought to be returned
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> | You'll get EBADF if you try it on anything else
>
> and that's definitely wrong, on a pipe the system is allowed to return EINVAL,
> and that's what ought to be returned whenever the fd is not something that
> supports chmod (etc).
In article <986563ad-88c2-41b9-bf69-51b26240b...@me.com>,
Jason Thorpe wrote:
>Last year, I wrote implementations of the Linux eventfd(2) and
>timerfd(2) interfaces for NetBSD, with the goal of improving our Linux
>emulation. In order to be able to test them with ATF tests, I went
>ahead and
Date:Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:54:06 -0700
From:Jason Thorpe
Message-ID: <63bf9e95-498a-4389-9a14-2f3c87a51...@me.com>
| I've changed the man pages to state "set for non-blocking I/O".
That should be much better.
| Yes, they're file descriptors, so close(2) gets rid
On Sep 18, 10:26, Jason Thorpe wrote:
}
} Last year, I wrote implementations of the Linux eventfd(2) and
} timerfd(2) interfaces for NetBSD, with the goal of improving our
} Linux emulation. In order to be able to test them with ATF tests,
} I went ahead and made them native calls as well.
}
}
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 3:35 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>
>Date:Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:21:27 -0700
>From:Jason Thorpe
>Message-ID: <5e7b8a22-14c2-4dce-ace2-31552f412...@me.com>
>
>
> | > unless the
> | > .Nm
> | > object was created with
> | > .Dv TFD_NONBLOCK .
>
Date:Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:21:27 -0700
From:Jason Thorpe
Message-ID: <5e7b8a22-14c2-4dce-ace2-31552f412...@me.com>
| > unless the
| > .Nm
| > object was created with
| > .Dv TFD_NONBLOCK .
|
| I'm using those names, because those are the names used in
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>
>Date:Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:26:29 -0700
>From:Jason Thorpe
>Message-ID: <986563ad-88c2-41b9-bf69-51b26240b...@me.com>
>
>
> |https://www.netbsd.org/~thorpej/timerfd.2
>
> This one contains duplicated
Date:Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:26:29 -0700
From:Jason Thorpe
Message-ID: <986563ad-88c2-41b9-bf69-51b26240b...@me.com>
| https://www.netbsd.org/~thorpej/timerfd.2
This one contains duplicated text...
Because they are associated with a file descriptor, they may
(Yes, this is a re-run … but I’m ready to merge it if there are no objections,
so…)
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
> Last year, I wrote implementations of the Linux eventfd(2) and timerfd(2)
> interfaces for NetBSD, with the goal of improving our Linux emulation. In
>
Last year, I wrote implementations of the Linux eventfd(2) and timerfd(2)
interfaces for NetBSD, with the goal of improving our Linux emulation. In
order to be able to test them with ATF tests, I went ahead and made them native
calls as well.
Here are the man pages describing the interfaces:
14 matches
Mail list logo
