> On Sep 28, 2019, at 6:53 PM, matthew green wrote:
>
>> Comments?
>
> i like the clean up. it's clearly a step forward.
>
> i only don't understand why 32 bit platforms can't handle
> large values here but 64 bit ones can. is it only so that the
> 32 bit platforms don't use 64 bit maths
> Comments?
i like the clean up. it's clearly a step forward.
i only don't understand why 32 bit platforms can't handle
large values here but 64 bit ones can. is it only so that the
32 bit platforms don't use 64 bit maths when it's not needed?
it just seems wrong to me to limit 32 bit
Hi,
I was looking at the man page for hstohz and hztoms and their function
signatures say "int hztoms(int);" and "int mztohz(int);" where the
implementations use unsigned. We also have 64 bit specific implementations
only for sparc64 and amd64 and only for mstohz() and not for hztoms():
The
