On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:22:25AM +, David Holland wrote:
Anyone has commnts about this ? I'd still like to hear some from
UVM/UBC experts ...
Should this be pulled up to -4? It applies cleanly and I can probably
test it (some...)
Yes, it's also needed for -4 (AFAIK it's older than
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:27:43PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Anyone has commnts about this ? I'd still like to hear some from
UVM/UBC experts ...
Should this be pulled up to -4? It applies cleanly and I can probably
test it (some...)
Yes, it's also needed for -4 (AFAIK
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:53:58PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I found the cause of for this one:
[...]
To fix this I propose to have ffs_trucate() (and derivatives) always set
v_writesize, even if the real size of the inode didn't change.
The attached patch completely fixes the test
