hello. Is there a particular reason file descriptors are closed in
ascending order? Traditionally, file descriptors 2, 1 and 0 are always in
use and it seems like it might be a good idea to have those be the last to
get closed. I've seen some applications that close all their
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500
> > From: Thor Lancelot Simon
> >
> > You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page
> > again for
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page
again for the first time in years, I think it's a little misleading --
what I believe is meant by "A work must not be enqueued again
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page
again for the first time in years, I think it's a little misleading --
what I believe is
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500
From: Thor Lancelot Simon
You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at