Re: workqueue semantics [was Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?]

2016-01-06 Thread Brian Buhrow
hello. Is there a particular reason file descriptors are closed in ascending order? Traditionally, file descriptors 2, 1 and 0 are always in use and it seems like it might be a good idea to have those be the last to get closed. I've seen some applications that close all their

Re: workqueue semantics [was Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?]

2016-01-05 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500 > > From: Thor Lancelot Simon > > > > You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page > > again for

workqueue semantics [was Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?]

2016-01-05 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500 From: Thor Lancelot Simon You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page again for the first time in years, I think it's a little misleading -- what I believe is meant by "A work must not be enqueued again

Re: workqueue semantics [was Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?]

2016-01-05 Thread Paul Goyette
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote: Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500 From: Thor Lancelot Simon You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at the manual page again for the first time in years, I think it's a little misleading -- what I believe is

Re: workqueue semantics [was Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?]

2016-01-05 Thread Paul Goyette
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Taylor R Campbell wrote: Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:48:42 -0500 From: Thor Lancelot Simon You can probably use workqueues for this. Looking at