On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 20120605013242.ga7...@panix.com,
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:13:09PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
That is a good idea! The only problem with it is that ps -sx and the sysctl
limit will
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:16:45PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
The latter is my preference. How many processes ever have lid 1 exit early?
Yes, do not count lid 1 and don't have it decrement the count on exit.
Martin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:16:45PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
The latter is my preference. How many processes ever have lid 1 exit early?
Yes, do not count lid 1 and don't have it decrement the count on exit.
some processes
If you look at the pmap(1) output for something like firefox on amd64 you see:
0040 36K read/exec /usr/pkg/lib/xulrunner/xulrunner-bin
00609000 4K read/write [ anon ]
7F7FC040 64K read/write [ anon ]
7F7FC041960K
Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
this, but I have not started checking them all.
--
Thor Lancelot Simont...@panix.com
We cannot usually in
On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
this, but I have not started checking them all.
directly or through parents?
Not all ports
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
this, but I have not
- usbd_bus_methods{} gains a get_lock() to enable the
host controller to provide a lock for the USB code.
if the lock isn't provided, old-style protection is
(partially) applied.
It is better if the USB driver can select the lock, like in FreeBSD. Else
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:03:49PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a
candidate for
this, but I have not started checking them all.
directly or
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
I see you say buses. So I assume you're taking into account funny
constraints to do with bus
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
I see you say buses. So I assume you're taking into account funny
constraints to do
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 19:59:08 matthew green wrote:
- usbd_bus_methods{} gains a get_lock() to enable the
host controller to provide a lock for the USB code.
if the lock isn't provided, old-style protection is
(partially) applied.
It
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
I see you say buses.
13 matches
Mail list logo
