On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 01:29:39AM -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Here's what I've implemented:
>
> kern.module.noautoload="compat_linux* compat_[0-4]?"
>
> This disables autoload for all compat_linux modules as well
> as compat_netbsd < NetBSD-5.0
>
> Comments?
>
> christos
>
...
> +
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 02:39:19PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> 4. Rasterizing (c). This is the whole purpose of METAFONT. METAFONT is a
> rasterizer.
Rasterization of vector fonts by privileged code has been a major source
of security holes in other operating systems. Does the very
> So far all good. But there is a catch: some architectures have native
> ways to store their partitions and no real userland support for those
> schemes. [...]
> Userland, however, has no way (that I know of) to learn about such
> conversions. The above recipe with "disklabel -r" will fail on
mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes:
>So far all good. But there is a catch: some architectures have native
>ways to store their partitions and no real userland support for those schemes.
Some drivers may also have their own idea about what disklabels
are, in particular cd(4). I wouldn't
Hey folks,
I am wondering, despite the fact that we are trying to phase out as many
uses of disklabels as fast as we can, if we should add an ioctl to the
disk devices that tells us if a label has been found.
Currently the only method to check a "blank" disk is to run
disklabel -r
> Yes, we will - but can't we make that something detectable? If the
> kernel invents a lael, it says "fictitious" in the label field.
i had a similar idea, and i like your "converted" idea too.
i was looking at struct disklabel itself, and while i realised
we could probably abuse d_subtype to
In article <20190929090053.g...@homeworld.netbsd.org>,
wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 01:29:39AM -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Here's what I've implemented:
>>
>> kern.module.noautoload="compat_linux* compat_[0-4]?"
>>
>> This disables autoload for all compat_linux modules as well
>> as
from Kamil Rytarowski:
> My primary motivation is running LTP kernel regression tests for
> compat_linux and integrate them into ATF (src/tests).
> With musl it is posible to get cross-toolchain for the same CPU
> configuration as host without building customized gcc/clang.
> >>> Did you
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:15:02AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> however, disklabel fails at >2TiB for 512 byte sector, so i'm
> now thinking that fixing this doesn't really solve the problem
> for the future properly -- disklabel doesn't return a true
> label here anyway... so it seems that we
Date:Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:32:51 +0200
From:Martin Husemann
Message-ID: <20190929113251.ga12...@mail.duskware.de>
| If you just ask for the label
|
| disklabel $mydisk
|
| you will always get something.
Yes, we will - but can't we make that something
10 matches
Mail list logo