Hi,
last night I got the panic below on a fairly busy ftp/http server
(serving static content). The kernel is 5.0_STABLE from Jan, 19.
Does it ring a bell to someone ?
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion c-c_cpu-cc_lwp == curlwp ||
c-c_cpu-cc_active != c failed: file
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Hi,
last night I got the panic below on a fairly busy ftp/http server
(serving static content). The kernel is 5.0_STABLE from Jan, 19.
Does it ring a bell to someone ?
I'll bet that c-c_cpu is from curcpu and that the callout is
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:47:50PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Sigh. Andy did; I didn't. I completely missed that he clearly excluded
embedded platforms from his original comments.
np.
I *do* think it's a useful datapoint to note that sun2, pmax, algor, etc.
are never, ever
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:16:26PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Hi,
last night I got the panic below on a fairly busy ftp/http server
(serving static content). The kernel is 5.0_STABLE from Jan, 19.
Does it ring a bell to
Gentlepeople,
It's clear that GDB requires a way to step and resume single threads,
which currently doesn't exist. (I checked the analogous procfs
machinery -- it doesn't have that either, and in fact it is behind
ptrace because it doesn't even have a way to do *any* operations on
threads other
Andrew Doran a...@netbsd.org wrote:
I *do* think it's a useful datapoint to note that sun2, pmax, algor, etc.
are never, ever downloaded any more.
Right, and these dead ports must be euthanized. The mountain of
unused device drivers and core kernel code is a signficant hinderance to
I *do* think it's a useful datapoint to note that sun2, pmax, algor, etc.
are never, ever downloaded any more.
Right, and these dead ports must be euthanized. The mountain of
unused device drivers and core kernel code is a signficant hinderance to
people working in the kernel.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Mar 19, 2010, at 4:14 PM, David Young wrote:
Regardless of what we do or do not do with sun2 et cetera, TNF could
buy
some ARM and MIPS boards for developers. ARM and MIPS boards,
however,
are not so precious as a sun2. In fact,
der Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org wrote:
[...] sun2, pmax, algor, etc. [...]
Right, and these dead ports must be euthanized.
For those single developers who still have such machines, as a
hardware replacement and moral compensation, TNF could buy some new
ARM or MIPS board for
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:14:57PM -0500, David Young wrote:
Regardless of what we do or do not do with sun2 et cetera, TNF could buy
some ARM and MIPS boards for developers. ARM and MIPS boards, however,
are not so precious as a sun2. In fact, they're abundant, and cheap.
Nevertheless,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:45:21PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:14:57PM -0500, David Young wrote:
Regardless of what we do or do not do with sun2 et cetera, TNF could buy
some ARM and MIPS boards for developers. ARM and MIPS boards, however,
are not so
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:19:47PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Have a look at
http://www.rmicorp.com/assets/docs/2070SG_XLR_XLS_Product_Selection_Guide_2008-12-16.pdf
specifically at the bottom few rows on the XLS chart. You're looking at
parts that have 3 or 4 Gig-E interfaces, tons of
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:23:35PM +, Herb Peyerl wrote:
Last time I bought a cavium board it was $5k USD... An Octeon 3850
was $700 for 1521 piece part... I didn't think they had anything
reasonable down below $500? (and as far as I remember, they already
had FreeBSD running on the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:30:43PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Cavium and Raza (Now NetLogic) both have low-core-count parts in
the way sub-$100 price range. Same basic architecture as the big
parts (these aren't their cut-down 32-bit parts), just less cores and
less goodies.
Even
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:19:27PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
FYI -- and I doubt you could really buy just one of these at this price --
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
FYI -- and I doubt you could really buy just one of these at this price --
Hi,
I'm seeing a panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc.
Does anyone have a similar panic?
The kernel is -current from March 15.
I cannot repeat the panic reliably, but it seems to occur after
suspend/resume (immediately or several minutes later).
The panic occured in /home, which is a ffs on cgd on wd.
Currently, the -S option for envstat(8) is documented to
...restore defaults to all devices registered with the framework.
This will remove all properties that were set in the configuration
file to the setting that the drivers use by default.
This was written this way long ago,
On 19/03/2010, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
Currently, the -S option for envstat(8) is documented to
...restore defaults to all devices registered with the framework.
This will remove all properties that were set in the configuration
file to the setting that the drivers
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Andrew Doran a...@netbsd.org wrote:
Random example:
I had to abandon two paid efforts last year because I ran out
of time owing to the huge amount of MD code, a lot of which is unused.
That was TNF's money and my time down the toilet, and we missed out
on
On Mar 19, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Michael wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Mar 19, 2010, at 4:14 PM, David Young wrote:
Regardless of what we do or do not do with sun2 et cetera, TNF could buy
some ARM and MIPS boards for developers. ARM and MIPS boards,
21 matches
Mail list logo
