Re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, take 2 (wasRe: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label)

2011-03-18 Thread Greg Oster
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:57:49 +1100 matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote: this patch seems to fix my problem. i've moved the call to fix the label into rf_reasonable_label() itself, right before the valid return, and made the fix up also fix the partitionSizeHi. greg, what do you think?

re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, take 2 (wasRe: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label)

2011-03-18 Thread matthew green
this patch seems to fix my problem. i've moved the call to fix the label into rf_reasonable_label() itself, right before the valid return, and made the fix up also fix the partitionSizeHi. greg, what do you think? Looks good to me. Go for it. oh, it isn't. supposed to use

re: libquota proposal

2011-03-18 Thread matthew green
this seems reasonable to me. why don't you stick it in libutil? As this is needed to get netatalk to build again on HEAD, I'd like to commit this in the next few days. this is what i'm talking about about using a different name for the new syscall that takes totally different arguments. is