Yes, I'm being hypocritical :-)
On 31 May 2015 at 02:05, matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
hi Andrew! :)
Who is appalled to discover that pc532 support has been removed!
get your GCC and binutils and GDB pals to put the support back
in the toolchain and we'll have something to talk
On 30 May 2015 at 19:09, David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
The reason I floated the idea of forking is that an OS that's
specifically intended to be a high-quality Unix for older hardware can
make a different set of decisions (most notably, it can let C++ go
hang) and this allows
Hello,
Thanks to Nick, my xhci patches has been applied to nick-nhusb
branch.
I summarise current problems I found.
Some of them are ongoing to solve, about some of them I have no idea
why they happen.
--
+ HS hub in 3.0 hub under 3.0 port is disconnected and reconnected every
several
hi Andrew! :)
Who is appalled to discover that pc532 support has been removed!
get your GCC and binutils and GDB pals to put the support back
in the toolchain and we'll have something to talk about :-)
note that we've revived the playstation2 port now that its has
had its toolchain components
On 31 May 2015 at 00:09, David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
I'm saying that, fundamentally, if you want to run gcc4 or gcc5 on a
Sparc IPC that you're going to have problems. There is no way around
this, except maybe to float a new compiler with the specific goal of
both being
On 31/05/15 06:05, matthew green wrote:
hi Andrew! :)
Who is appalled to discover that pc532 support has been removed!
In addition to toolchain support, the hardware was near-extinct at the
time of removal.
Now, the hardware is no longer near-extinct:
http://cpu-ns32k.net/
I used the
Antti Kantee wrote:
On 31/05/15 06:05, matthew green wrote:
hi Andrew! :)
Who is appalled to discover that pc532 support has been removed!
In addition to toolchain support, the hardware was near-extinct at the
time of removal.
Now, the hardware is no longer near-extinct:
