>> But it's less a lack of interest and more an unwillingness to ignore
>> the licensing issues. `Modern' GCC is licensed under the GPLv3.
> try clang, which usually has newer/better sanitizers.
clang is - or at least was last I checked - under the impression that
nested functions are
> But it's less a lack of interest and more an unwillingness to ignore
> the licensing issues. `Modern' GCC is licensed under the GPLv3. I
try clang, which usually has newer/better sanitizers.
>> Perhaps I just need a better approach
> I know you've previously expressed a lack of interest in such things
> when we've talked previously, but I've found the built-in sanitizers
> in modern GCC useful for approximating the functionality of valgrind
> on NetBSD.
To some extent, perhaps.
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:39:06PM -0500, Mouse wrote:
> Perhaps I just need a better approach
I know you've previously expressed a lack of interest in such
things when we've talked previously, but I've found the built-in
sanitizers in modern GCC useful for approximating the functionality
of
