Hi,
Thank you for your detailed comments!
On 2022/09/15 20:09, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:08:52 +0900
From:Kengo NAKAHARA
Message-ID: <279eae4e-79f4-39c0-5279-83d5738b6...@iij.ad.jp>
| Can version bump up to 9.99.100? Is there anything
David Brownlee writes:
> On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 19:27, Brad Spencer wrote:
>>
>> In the foggy recesses of my memory this is Just How It Is Done. At my
>> final $DAYJOB we had a set of systems that had some PERC controller in
>> them. The desire was to present the raw disks to Hadoop and the
On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 19:27, Brad Spencer wrote:
>
> In the foggy recesses of my memory this is Just How It Is Done. At my
> final $DAYJOB we had a set of systems that had some PERC controller in
> them. The desire was to present the raw disks to Hadoop and the only
> way that could be done
Edgar Fuß writes:
>> There is a PERC H330 and a PERC HBA330 and the Dell PERC9 user manual
>> (includes the H330) says you can boot it in HBA mode. Not sure if
>> that means that you can chose the firmware.
> When I set the H330 to HBA mode, it still attaches as mfii0, the only
> difference to
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:32:02 +0200
> From: Paweł Cichowski
>
> I am trying it out now, unfortunately I'm running into this error:
> fatal privileged instruction fault in supervisor mode
> [...]
> kernel: privileged instruction fault trap, code=0
> Stopped in pid 0.0 (system) at
e...@math.uni-bonn.de (Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?=) writes:
>What /does/ work is setting the controller to RAID mode and create two
>volumes with a one-element RAID-0. But that feels like crazy.
That's a common setup. In particular it allows to present a "right-sized" disk
so that you can
> There is a PERC H330 and a PERC HBA330 and the Dell PERC9 user manual
> (includes the H330) says you can boot it in HBA mode. Not sure if
> that means that you can chose the firmware.
When I set the H330 to HBA mode, it still attaches as mfii0, the only
difference to RAID mode being that the
Date:Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:08:52 +0900
From:Kengo NAKAHARA
Message-ID: <279eae4e-79f4-39c0-5279-83d5738b6...@iij.ad.jp>
| Can version bump up to 9.99.100? Is there anything wrong?
It can. There are no issues with the base system (incl xsrc)
I have tested this in
Hi, thank you so much for your explanation and detailed descriptions in the
patch you provided.
Unfortunately there are some very tricky issues in here with handling
pmaps. So it'll take a bit more to get it working. There are also
It seems like I was quite close to finally getting it
Hi,
I want to commit some fixes which need to bump up.
E.g. fix to be left inconsistent routes
https://github.com/knakahara/netbsd-src/commit/0ce8e1114d42e51a1ea88f42b1d942563c8312d6
Can version bump up to 9.99.100? Is there anything wrong?
Thanks,
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
