6b...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de writes:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:03:14 +0200
From: Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr
To: 6b...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: netbsd-5.1_RC3 crash at Dell M710
Can anyone tell me why, exactly, we shouldn't remove bound AF_LOCAL
sockets from the filesystem on last close? The following test program
produces second socket bind failed on every system I've tested it on,
and seems to cover the only possible use case for this feature...
Have you
Thor Simon t...@coyotepoint.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:47:49AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
Can anyone tell me why, exactly, we shouldn't remove bound AF_LOCAL
sockets from the filesystem on last close? The following test program
produces second socket bind failed on every
The comment was made when I proposed that fix is that it will NOT handle
the MP case because splserial() doesn't affect other CPUs. And one of
the commenters pointed me to places to look for how to do the MP part.
Thanks - that makes sense.
I haven't done that yet; it's on my to-do
I've run into the bug described at:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2010/03/17/msg016596.html
and the proposed fix (splserial) seems to work. This is on an amd64 VM;
we'll try a physical (multi-cpu) machine as well.
Reading the various messages, I get the impression that KGDB on MP
201 - 205 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
