Re: Emulating linux timer.. syscalls

On 24/11/2021 21:50, Mohamed Atef wrote: Hello there,     I am a computer systems engineering student in my final year, i'd like to contribute to your community (Hint: I don't care about GSoC). I am interested in operating Systems, runtime systems, and compilers. I have strong C knowledge,

Re: Booting HP DL360 gen9

On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Dima Veselov wrote: Greetings, I try to boot recent NetBSD on HP DL360g9 and it seems to be not supported. -current INSTALL kernel fail here: [ 1.0455437] Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 VCU (miscellaneous system, revision 0x02) at pci29 dev 31 function 2 not

Re: Funded project(s) to improve Linux emulation

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, nia wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:36:06PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: - Improve linux audio support Does anyone know what's needed yet? What springs to mind is that when running the existing net/citrix_ica package (or any update of it that will run under current

Re: GSoC 2020 - The NetBSD Foundation - Emulating linux timer.. syscalls

On 22/03/2020 21:34, Humayun Mulla wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Humayun Mulla, I am a graduate student pursuing MS in > Computer Science from State University of New York, Binghamton. I have a > total work experience of 6 years of which 1 year as an Assistant > Professor and 5 years in the

Re: RAIDframe and bad blocks

On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Consider a RAID 1 with wd0 and wd1 wd1 has bad blocks and is marked failed. I replace it and reconstruct the RAID with a new disk. But wd0 also has bad blocks, and RAIDframe will give up reconstruction because of the read failure. Most likely the

Re: Removing PF

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2019-04-01 15:16, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Maxime Villard wrote: 2) If the effort had been on one firewall instead of three, the one chosen would be more functional. Well, I cannot tell for PF, but IPF is functionnal, I use it

Re: Removing PF

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Jaromír Dole�~Mek wrote: Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 14:32, Stephen Borrill a écrit : Your two statements are mutually inconsistent: 1) No-one is maintaining ipf or pf and 2) If the effort had been on one firewall instead of three, the one chosen would be more functional. IMO

Re: Removing PF

On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Maxime Villard wrote: Le 30/03/2019 à 08:51, Michael van Elst a écrit : On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 08:17:44AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: Le 30/03/2019 à 08:07, Michael van Elst a écrit : m...@m00nbsd.net (Maxime Villard) writes: If the effort hadn't been split on three

Re: Merging ugen into the usb stack

On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Martin Husemann wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Wolfgang Solfrank wrote: Hi, with the attached diffs I'm able to attach my debug board like this: ugen0 at uhub5 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 ugen0: OpenMoko (0x1457) Debug Board for Neo1973 (0x5118),

Re: Merging ugen into the usb stack

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Martin Husemann wrote: [snip] However, it can not work with the way NetBSD uses ugen devices: uftdi0 at uhub3 port 2 uftdi0: FTDI (0x9e88) SheevaPlug JTAGKey FT2232D B (0x9e8f), rev 2.00/5.00, addr 3 ucom0 at uftdi0 portno 1 ucom1 at uftdi0 portno 2 I can disable the ucom

Re: IPfilter panic in 7.1

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Christos Zoulas wrote: In article <1n8zh65.79uodgaqcnrcm%m...@netbsd.org>, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Hi I am hit by frequent IPfilter panics on a firewall setup after upgrading to 7.1. Is it something someone else experienced? Sounds like a bug we

Re: 4.0 userland on 6.1 kernel: sa_register failed

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Edgar Fuss wrote: I tried updating a 4.0.1 machine (amd64) to 6.1 by first updating the kernel and I get a ``libpthread: sa_register failed: Invalid argument'' (when trying to start nslcd). Any hints? Is this down to the kern.no_sa_support sysctl? -- Stephen

Re: WAPBL panic

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Christos Zoulas wrote: On Nov 20, 1:45pm, m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote: -- Subject: Re: WAPBL panic | On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:06:02AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > I don't know. Can you reproduce it? Removing a very large file or tree? | | Well I would

Re: mount_nfs(8) correction

On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, Rich Neswold wrote: Index: sbin/mount_nfs/mount_nfs.8 == --- sbin/mount_nfs/mount_nfs.8 +++ sbin/mount_nfs/mount_nfs.8 @@ -366,11 +366,11 @@ when mounting servers that do not support .Tn TCP mounts. .It Fl X

Re: Removal of compat-FreeBSD

On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Maxime Villard wrote: I intend to remove the compat-FreeBSD support from the system. Can tw_cli be run in any other way to manage 3ware RAID cards? -- Stephen

Re: Problem in msdosfs_moutfs

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Matthias Drochner wrote: While we are here... (Sorry, I'm too busy with other things, otherwise I'd do it myself.) I found that msdosfs mount fails for some pre-formatted USB thumb drives due to a too strict bpb check. See attachment, but it might make sense to find another

Re: options VND_COMPRESSION

On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Taylor R Campbell wrote: Only a few kernel configurations have options VND_COMPRESSION enabled by default -- i386/GENERIC and a few evbarm kernels, mainly. Any reason we don't have it enabled in many others, e.g. amd64/GENERIC? I haven't hammered on vnd(4) with compressed

Re: Serious WAPL performance problems

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Edgar Fu? wrote: I suggest trying the latest 5.1 sources Do I really need to build from source or will 5.1.2 suffice? 5.1.2 isn't enough. But use a daily build and then you don't need to build yourself: http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-5/ -- Stephen

Re: Adding a new file system

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Alistair Crooks wrote: I recently started writing a file system for some specific use-cases, and had to make a number of changes. There was a request that I write up the steps that needed to be taken, and so this tries to outline them. [snip] Looks like a prime topic for

Re: Respawn crashed PUFFS filesystems?

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: At least one of the things you've forgotten right up front is that if a filesystem server process tips over, the first thing you need to do is run fsck... and be prepared to cope with fsck failing. I

Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: As far as I can tell we have emulation code for: Darwin (no GUI, doesn't to have been updated in the last 5 years) FreeBSD (does it even handle FreeBSD 4?) [snip] (1) Can the emulation run real world application and which? It can run the 3ware

Re: NetBSD kernel modules.

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Iain Hibbert wrote: [snip] In any case, there is plenty of state about the current Bluetooth connections that is held inside the controller and would be lost if the device was powered down with no way that I know of to reinstate it, not to mention that devices would likely be

Re: mpt Serious performance issues

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Stephan wrote: I already sent this to netbsd-users but didn´t get an answer. The Netbsd mpt driver in release 5.0.2 and 5.1 does perform extremely slow on LSI Logic 1030 RAID controllers. Some findings: Write speed: # dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile bs=4096 count=1 1+0

Re: rbuf starvation in the iwn driver

On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Sverre Froyen wrote: Attached is a minimal patch that fixes the iwn lock-ups (at least for me :-). Slightly off-topic: Was there any progress backporting the 5100/5300 support to netbsd-5? -- Stephen

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Paul Goyette wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Tobias Nygren wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:12:32 + Paul Goyette pgoye...@netbsd.org wrote: Modified Files: src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL GENERIC Log Message: Add acpismbus enries -

Re: NetBSD 5.0.1 and kmods

On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Matthew Mondor wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:09 -0500 Matthew Mondor mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote: Unless this recently changed, I think that netbsd-5 modload(8) currently only supports the dynamic loading of LKMs (old-style modules from /usr/lkm/). I think that I