On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:06:07 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
As such, I want to propose moving the last two categories into the Attic
for further dusting.
It makes sense to me,
--
Matt
Hi Joerg.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:06:07PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Hi all,
the following is what I consider as summary of the thread.
Use cases mentioned for or considered simple enough:
- Linux
- FreeBSD
- OSF1
- Ultrix
- SVR/SVR4
Incomplete, broken and of questionable
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:40:44AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
With modules now basically working we should either retire or move
some of these items to pkgsrc so that the interested parties maintain them.
An awful lot of the compat stuff is now very compartmentalised, with not
much more
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:40:44 +
Andrew Doran a...@netbsd.org wrote:
With modules now basically working we should either retire or move
some of these items to pkgsrc so that the interested parties maintain them.
An awful lot of the compat stuff is now very compartmentalised, with not
much
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:25:07AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:13:36AM +0200, haad wrote:
With solaris.kmod we are compatible with solaris kernel, (we should
be able to load solaris kernel modules).
Have you actually tried this? I am pretty sure it
On Tue Mar 01 2011 at 09:55:38 +, Andrew Doran wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:25:07AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:13:36AM +0200, haad wrote:
With solaris.kmod we are compatible with solaris kernel, (we should
be able to load solaris kernel
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:05:15PM -0800, Brian Buhrow wrote:
Hello. As of NetBSD-5.0, I can run FreeBSD statically linked binaries
without a problem. I'm using the FreeBSD binary of t_cli, as someone else
is, and it says the following:
#file /usr/local/sbin/tw_cli
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
there is a lot of code in sys/compat and changes in the kernel API tend
to require changes in this code too. I would like to know which
emulations are actually in use, what the status of emulation is (both in
terms of stability and feature set)
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
As far as I can tell we have emulation code for:
Darwin (no GUI, doesn't to have been updated in the last 5 years)
FreeBSD (does it even handle FreeBSD 4?)
[snip]
(1) Can the emulation run real world application and which?
It can run the 3ware
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
Hi all,
there is a lot of code in sys/compat and changes in the kernel API tend
to require changes in this code too. I would like to know which
emulations are actually in use, what the status of emulation
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:13:36AM +0200, haad wrote:
With solaris.kmod we are compatible with solaris kernel, (we should
be able to load solaris kernel modules).
Have you actually tried this? I am pretty sure it would not work.
It appears to me that solaris.kmod includes shims that provide
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:35:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
FreeBSD (does it even handle FreeBSD 4?)
Five or so years ago this could run the distributed.net
proxy. I don't use this application anymore.
OSF1
As of a few years ago, it could run the distributed.net client.
This was
In message 201103010105.p2115fe4002...@lothlorien.nfbcal.org
on Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:05:15 -0800,
buh...@lothlorien.nfbcal.org (Brian Buhrow) wrote:
Hello. As of NetBSD-5.0, I can run FreeBSD statically linked binaries
without a problem. I'm using the FreeBSD binary of
Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
- Hi all,
- there is a lot of code in sys/compat and changes in the kernel API tend
- to require changes in this code too. I would like to know which
- emulations are actually in use, what the status of emulation is (both in
- terms of stability and feature set) and
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
FreeBSD (does it even handle FreeBSD 4?)
(1) Can the emulation run real world application and which?
(4) Is the emulation in use?
I was going to say that there are at least packages in pkgsrc that are
FreeBSD binaries, but the only one I
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:35:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
FreeBSD (does it even handle FreeBSD 4?)
No.
IRIX
Jan Schaumann might know when this last was used in the wild.
SVR3
This was actually very good at one point -- I managed to use it to install
and run Oracle! But I do
Hi all,
there is a lot of code in sys/compat and changes in the kernel API tend
to require changes in this code too. I would like to know which
emulations are actually in use, what the status of emulation is (both in
terms of stability and feature set) and based on that, whether some of
them
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
Hi all,
there is a lot of code in sys/compat and changes in the kernel API tend
to require changes in this code too. I would like to know which
emulations are actually in use, what the status of emulation is
18 matches
Mail list logo
