On Mon, 5 May 2014 01:10:24 -0400
Matthew Mondor mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote:
which some CPUs might have trouble with (i.e. RAS)...
I think that what I meant was CAS
--
Matt
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:21:02 +0200
Johnny Billquist b...@softjar.se wrote:
On 2014-04-02 16:10, John Nemeth wrote:
On Apr 2, 1:55pm, Johnny Billquist wrote:
} The root fs in on nfs, as I'm running the machine diskless. Disk is
} served from a -current NetBSD/alpha system sitting right
On 2014-04-01 23:04, Warner Losh wrote:
On Apr 1, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Johnny Billquist b...@softjar.se wrote:
Good points.
Is this the right time to ask why booting NetBSD on a VAX (a 3500) now takes
more than 15 minutes? What is the system doing all that time???
FreeBSD used to take forever
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:55:04PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
The time between entering a username and getting the password prompt in
the same 3500 with the latest release is something like 30 seconds.
Mostly it needs someone with an affected machine to debug it. My bet
would be on PAM
On 2014-04-02 14:00, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:55:04PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
The time between entering a username and getting the password prompt in
the same 3500 with the latest release is something like 30 seconds.
Mostly it needs someone with an affected
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
What model of VAX do you have, and how long does it take to boot, to the
point where you get the login prompt on the console?
VS4000/M96 with 128 MB, and local scsi disk - very nice machine ;-)
Didn't measure exactly right now,
Martin Husemann skrev 2014-04-02 15:33:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
What model of VAX do you have, and how long does it take to boot, to the
point where you get the login prompt on the console?
VS4000/M96 with 128 MB, and local scsi disk - very nice
On Apr 2, 1:55pm, Johnny Billquist wrote:
} On 2014-04-01 23:04, Warner Losh wrote:
} On Apr 1, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Johnny Billquist b...@softjar.se wrote:
}
} Good points.
} Is this the right time to ask why booting NetBSD on a VAX (a 3500) now
takes more than 15 minutes? What is the system
On 2014-04-02 15:38, Anders Magnusson wrote:
Martin Husemann skrev 2014-04-02 15:33:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
What model of VAX do you have, and how long does it take to boot, to the
point where you get the login prompt on the console?
VS4000/M96 with
On 2014-04-02 16:10, John Nemeth wrote:
On Apr 2, 1:55pm, Johnny Billquist wrote:
} The root fs in on nfs, as I'm running the machine diskless. Disk is
} served from a -current NetBSD/alpha system sitting right next to it. And
} I have changed the Alpha to run at 10 MB/s half duplex, and I have
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Erik Fair wrote:
On Mar 27, 2014, at 11:29 , matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
it certainly can be improved for this situation, but i've
got an SS10 with mis-matched cpus (2x100mhz, 1x150mhz,
the latter with a bigger cache and thus significantly
faster than the
On Apr 1, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Johnny Billquist b...@softjar.se wrote:
Good points.
Is this the right time to ask why booting NetBSD on a VAX (a 3500) now takes
more than 15 minutes? What is the system doing all that time???
FreeBSD used to take forever to boot on certain low-end ARM CPUs with
On Mar 27, 2014, at 11:29 , matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
it certainly can be improved for this situation, but i've
got an SS10 with mis-matched cpus (2x100mhz, 1x150mhz,
the latter with a bigger cache and thus significantly
faster than the other cpus) and it works pretty fine.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 07:32:24PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
I recently ordered an ODROID-XU Lite to help beat on the my ARM MP code.
Ah... for a second I thought you want to add support for the VAX 11/782.
-is
On Mar 27, 2014 2:32 AM, Matt Thomas m...@3am-software.com wrote:
I recently ordered an ODROID-XU Lite to help beat on the my ARM MP code.
However, it has a quirk that I don't think our scheduler will deal with.
It has 4 Cortex-A15 cores @ 1.4Ghz and 4 Cortex-A7 cores @ 1.2Ghz. Even
if the
However, it has a quirk that I don't think our scheduler will deal with.
It has 4 Cortex-A15 cores @ 1.4Ghz and 4 Cortex-A7 cores @ 1.2Ghz. Even
if the frequencies weren't different, the A15 cores at least twice as
fast per cycle than the A7. That asymmetry is going to cause havoc with
16 matches
Mail list logo
