Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

2019-08-18 Thread Valery Ushakov
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:05:33PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> Ping? Can we switch from intptr_t to void*? > > Can we just go back to the original state? Anything wrong with the templated solution for c++11 I posted a few days ago, keeping the original state

Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

2019-08-18 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 18.08.2019 17:21, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:05:33PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> Ping? Can we switch from intptr_t to void*? > > Can we just go back to the original state? > > Joerg > Which original? intptr_t and caller level casts for C++? signature.asc

Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

2019-08-18 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:05:33PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > Ping? Can we switch from intptr_t to void*? Can we just go back to the original state? Joerg

Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

2019-08-18 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
Ping? Can we switch from intptr_t to void*? I declare to fix fallout for it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature