Alistair Crooks wrote:
> If it comes back, it needs to be modified to use curses - the hardcoded
> terminal escapes for a bunch of 1970s terminals is kinda cute in a retro
> way; it's also kinda embarassing.
>From a very quick look half of window sources (tt* and ww* files) are
its homebrew
If it comes back, it needs to be modified to use curses - the hardcoded
terminal escapes for a bunch of 1970s terminals is kinda cute in a retro
way; it's also kinda embarassing. I also miss it in base, though
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 16:01, matthew green wrote:
> personally, i miss window(1) in
personally, i miss window(1) in base. i used it when screen
was not yet installed, and i used it for less annoying setup
of a complex display with multiple overlapping or larger
than your actual display windows. it has features that
neither tmux or screen have.
i don't like the way that tmux
Tobias Nygren writes:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:12:39 +0200
> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> I propose to import window(1) into the base.
>>
>> tmux is a similar program to tmux, but much simpler and traditional in
>> the BSD environment. Personally I use tmux as a screen replacement for
>>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:12:39 +0200
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I propose to import window(1) into the base.
>
> tmux is a similar program to tmux, but much simpler and traditional in
> the BSD environment. Personally I use tmux as a screen replacement for
> detached consoles, but for management
I propose to import window(1) into the base.
tmux is a similar program to tmux, but much simpler and traditional in
the BSD environment. Personally I use tmux as a screen replacement for
detached consoles, but for management of windows I prefer window(1).
window(1) does one thing and does it
