Re: submission port usage (was: /etc/services losses)

2023-08-04 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Edgar Fuß wrote in : |I think the de-facto rationale for a larger network goes like this: |-- You don't want to get your IPs blacklisted because infected clients | send spam from within your network. |-- Other sites will allow mail submission on their submission port only | after

Re: Architecture neutral packages (mozilla-rootcerts-openssl)

2023-08-04 Thread Greg Troxel
David Brownlee writes: Please drop tech-pkg from this. This is a base system issue. > Another unmentioned local elephant is installations which do not use > sysinst (though I'm happy to suggest we specifically exclude those for > the first pass). People who do things manually do things

Re: Architecture neutral packages (mozilla-rootcerts-openssl)

2023-08-04 Thread David Brownlee
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 08:43, Martin Husemann wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:31:39PM +, John Klos wrote: > > How it ultimately happens is up to people who understand things better than > > I do, but what whould be lovely to see would be: > > > > 1) a way to install rootcerts in sysinst

submission port usage (was: /etc/services losses)

2023-08-04 Thread Edgar Fuß
I think the de-facto rationale for a larger network goes like this: -- You don't want to get your IPs blacklisted because infected clients send spam from within your network. -- Other sites will allow mail submission on their submission port only after authentication (SASL). So you block

Re: Architecture neutral packages (mozilla-rootcerts-openssl)

2023-08-04 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:31:39PM +, John Klos wrote: > How it ultimately happens is up to people who understand things better than > I do, but what whould be lovely to see would be: > > 1) a way to install rootcerts in sysinst > > 2) a way to install them post-install, and/or update them >