On 17.04.2019 19:28, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:02:47 +0200
> From:Kamil Rytarowski
> Message-ID:
>
> Thanks, and
>
> | +typedef pthread_t thrd_t;
>
> is a very clear answer to the question... Unless anyone
> has any objections to tha
Date:Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:02:47 +0200
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID:
Thanks, and
| +typedef pthread_tthrd_t;
is a very clear answer to the question... Unless anyone
has any objections to that method, I think we can ignore the
(possible) posix requirement
On 17.04.2019 18:52, Robert Elz wrote:
> I have seen this question:
>
> does anyone know of an implementation that has pthreads and
> C11/C17 threads, with pthread_t and thrd_t defined as different types?
>
> As best I can tell in NetBSD we do not have a thrd_t at
I have seen this question:
does anyone know of an implementation that has pthreads and
C11/C17 threads, with pthread_t and thrd_t defined as different types?
As best I can tell in NetBSD we do not have a thrd_t at all (but I
might be missing something). If we do, or someday we
