Le Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Jason Thorpe a écrit :
>
>
> > On May 17, 2023, at 11:21 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> >
> > I don't know on what mailing list to ask this...
> >
> > I have seen on the web site that changes to 10 have stopped in february
> > and that changes are
Le Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:50:04PM +0200, Martin Husemann a écrit :
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:47:33PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > But the fact that the advertised list of changes for 10 stops at
> > February 2023 is probably something the webmaster(s) should look
> > at: it's a bit
Le Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Martin Husemann a écrit :
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > There have been a steady stream of bug fixes from the trunk being
> > pulled into the netbsd-10 release branch. I don't have knowledge of
> > releng@'s plans vis
> On May 17, 2023, at 11:47 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> But the fact that the advertised list of changes for 10 stops at
> February 2023 is probably something the webmaster(s) should look
> at: it's a bit confusing/disturbing...
Those are just the major changes. There has been a focus
I don't know on what mailing list to ask this...
I have seen on the web site that changes to 10 have stopped in february
and that changes are now for 11...
Does this mean that 10 will never be released and that the focus is on
11 now?
--
Thierry Laronde
> On May 17, 2023, at 11:21 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> I don't know on what mailing list to ask this...
>
> I have seen on the web site that changes to 10 have stopped in february
> and that changes are now for 11...
>
> Does this mean that 10 will never be released and that the
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> There have been a steady stream of bug fixes from the trunk being
> pulled into the netbsd-10 release branch. I don't have knowledge of
> releng@'s plans vis a vis a release date.
You can find details about the 10.0 release state
at
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:47:33PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> But the fact that the advertised list of changes for 10 stops at
> February 2023 is probably something the webmaster(s) should look
> at: it's a bit confusing/disturbing...
Where do you see that?
Martin
Folks,
For "reasons" I have been looking to build nss-pam-ldapd and found that
there are there are some changes that have been made by FreeBSD to nss
that make it easier to port linux based applications that use nsswitch.
The first is fairly simple, import nss.h which provides a compat layer.
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:17:28AM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> What Version of binutils do -9, -10 and -current use? Are there patches in
> base that are missing in pkgsrc?
2.31, 2.34 and 2.39 respectively. And probably yes (but I wouldn't expect
anything relevant for amd64).
Martin
And another weird problem:
Using a lang/gcc8 compiler patched to use gas and gld from devel/binutils
2.26.1 (see other thread), when building pkgtools/pkg_install, I get
/usr/pkg/bin/gld:
/var/work/pkgsrc/pkgtools/pkg_install/work/libfetch/libfetch.a(common.o)(.text+0x1e5):
[Adding tech-userlevel for the base system questions]
For involved reasons, I patched lang/gcc8 to use gas/gld from devel/binutils
(analogous to what is done to use gas on Solaris).
This makes lang/gcc8 fail to build, it segfaults (cc1 nil pointer reference
in etc_set_father() calling
12 matches
Mail list logo
