Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:02:43 +1100 (EST)
From: Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
if you really really need to know that your cpu cache has 48 fully
associative entries, go consult the spec sheet. otherwise, save some
electrons.
or, how
Best thing would be to print it once per socket, i.e. for the first
core of each physical CPU.
Oh, and the flags can be subtly different for other CPUs in the
system, even if they are exactly the same model, because the BIOS can
enable/disable some features.
Yes to the first, and the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ian Darwin i...@darwinsys.com wrote:
Best thing would be to print it once per socket, i.e. for the first
core of each physical CPU.
Oh, and the flags can be subtly different for other CPUs in the
system, even if they are exactly the same model, because the
Mark Kettenis(mark.kette...@xs4all.nl) on 2010.11.27 20:12:14 +0100:
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:39:41 -0700
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
commit. someone will eventually fix MCLGETI, since it is in the tree.
The problem is that re(4) has a forever loop from which we only
What follows is a somewhat older mail I had forgotten about. It's
suddenly become more interesting to be because I was playing around with
jruby which requires a big heap size. It pisses me off to own a 3GB
laptop and only be able to use 1GB of that memory.
This does 2.5 things.
1. If
i agree with mark.
On 28/11/2010, at 11:12 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:02:43 +1100 (EST)
From: Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
if you really really need to know that your cpu cache has 48 fully
associative entries, go
On Sunday, November 28, 2010, David Gwynne d...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: d...@cvs.openbsd.org2010/11/28 17:04:09
Modified files:
sys/arch/amd64/include: cpu.h
Log message:
bump the number of supported cpus from 32 up
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010, David Gwynne d...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
...
Log message:
bump the number of supported cpus from 32 up to 64. lets me attach and use
all 48 cores in one of my boxes.
requested by deraadt@
made possible by the
On Sunday, November 28, 2010, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010, David Gwynne d...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
...
Log message:
bump the number of supported cpus from 32 up to 64. lets me attach and
use
all 48
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010, David Gwynne d...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
...
Log message:
bump the number of supported cpus from 32 up to 64. lets me attach and use
all 48 cores in one of my boxes.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:51:45PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
What follows is a somewhat older mail I had forgotten about. It's
suddenly become more interesting to be because I was playing around with
jruby which requires a big heap size. It pisses me off to own a 3GB
laptop and only be
11 matches
Mail list logo
