Desmalezadoras y Bordeadoras

2011-01-06 Thread TBX
Bordeadoraeleacute;ctrica 400w $ 110 Bordeadora26cc $ 520 Desmalezadora52cc $ 860

Garantovano najniže cene - samo u januaru!

2011-01-06 Thread Top Shop
Top Shop Ne zaboravite na januarski popust! Ostalo je još samo 18 dana da iskoristite kupon sa popustom i obezbedite sebi omiljene proizvode uz 10% popusta! PoEurite i iskoristite odmah garantovano najniEe cene! Kod Vašeg kupona je: 84ZEACSKJT VaEi do 31.1.2011. *kupon moEete koristiti samo

Re: ls(1) multibyte support

2011-01-06 Thread Alexander Polakov
* Alexander Polakov polac...@gmail.com [110105 17:20]: Hi, here's an updated version. 1) en_US.UTF-8.src updates from FreeBSD 2) wcwidth() changed to use the same code as iswprint() * maybe just use iswprint() itself? 3) _RUNETYPE_SW0 changed to be !0 (and match FreeBSD). 0 value is

nc -U -u (Unix datagram socket support)

2011-01-06 Thread Jeremy Evans
This patch adds unix datagram socket support to nc(1). It's basically the same patch I sent last June (see http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=127627296925965w=2), but updated for -current. Tested on amd64. Doesn't appear to cause any regressions to existing support, tested with unix stream and

Re: nc -U -u (Unix datagram socket support)

2011-01-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jeremy Evans jer...@openbsd.org wrote: This patch adds unix datagram socket support to nc(1). It's basically the same patch I sent last June (see http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=127627296925965w=2), but updated for -current. Tested on amd64. Doesn't appear

Re: nc -U -u (Unix datagram socket support)

2011-01-06 Thread Jeremy Evans
On 01/06 07:07, Ted Unangst wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jeremy Evans jer...@openbsd.org wrote: This patch adds unix datagram socket support to nc(1). ?It's basically the same patch I sent last June (see http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=127627296925965w=2), but updated for

Re: nc -U -u (Unix datagram socket support)

2011-01-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Jeremy Evans jer...@openbsd.org wrote: I believe that for unix stream sockets, you don't need to have a sending socket file created, while you do for datagram sockets, as otherwise you can't have a bidirectional connection. I have no problem with always using a

Re: increase i386 data size

2011-01-06 Thread Ariane van der Steldt
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 05:14:13PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:54:23 -0500 (EST) From: Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com increase the hard limit on i386 max data size to 2GB-1. This

Re: nc -U -u (Unix datagram socket support)

2011-01-06 Thread Jeremy Evans
On 01/06 08:56, Ted Unangst wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Jeremy Evans jer...@openbsd.org wrote: I believe that for unix stream sockets, you don't need to have a sending socket file created, while you do for datagram sockets, as otherwise you can't have a bidirectional connection.

Re: increase i386 data size

2011-01-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl wrote: I have no objection against -PAGE_SIZE. But for that matter, I don't object against plain 2GB either. It shouldn't end up in a signed value anyway. we're going to go with flat 2GB after all.

Canon EOS - Digital Reflex

2011-01-06 Thread DigitalesNet
USD870Camara Digital CANON EOS 500D T1I KIT 18-55 Caacute;mara reacute;flex digital de objetivos intercambiables / Sensor de imagen Tipo CMOS / Tamantilde;o 22.30