Here is a diff to enable the checksum offload support for stge(4).
Tested with..
stge0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 D-Link DGE-550T rev 0x07
Index: if_stge.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_stge.c,v
retrieving revision 1.54
Here is a diff to enable the checksum offload support for jme(4).
Tested with..
jme0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 JMicron JMC250 rev 0x11
Index: if_jme.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff
Here is a diff to add flow control support to vge(4).
Tested with..
vge0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 VIA VT612x rev 0x11
ciphy0 at vge0 phy 1: CS8201 10/100/1000TX PHY, rev. 1
OK?
Index: if_vge.c
===
RCS file:
attach fails early in case there's no firmware, but
athn_detach does ieee80211_ifdetach and if_detach
regardless of whether ifnet part got setup correctly
leading to a free of an unallocated memory and a
panic.
the following diff follows an established practice
in the other drivers and fixes the
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
attach fails early in case there's no firmware, but
athn_detach does ieee80211_ifdetach and if_detach
regardless of whether ifnet part got setup correctly
leading to a free of an unallocated memory and a
panic.
the following
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
Those vendors say we're not in the distribution business, distribution
problems will be handled by OS vendors. We can break compatibility to
advance, and not think about it, this is not
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
Those vendors say we're not in the distribution business, distribution
problems will be handled by OS vendors. We can
Apparently branding as a priority by some devs, is a major reason. I
can't believe a Gnome dev said he hadn't heard of XFCE to a
transmission dev!
http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/gnome-et-al-rotting-in-threes/
in some cases, you even have some people, who are PAID by some vendors,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
...
Relevant LWN.net article: http://lwn.net/Articles/520892/
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:15:04PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Rather than spending time on these, are trinity and mate etc.. worth
looking at?
I'm pretty sure trinity is worth looking at, haven't had nearly enough time
to do so, especially since it's yet another build system you need to
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
One could answer you that the BSD community is not involved enough with
upstream. 99% of the development is done on Linux by developers using Linux
-- if you want that to change, some !linux people should get involved in
On 11/06/2012 03:45 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
One could answer you that the BSD community is not involved enough with
upstream. 99% of the development is done on Linux by developers using Linux --
if you want that to change, some
Lets be honest, half the problem goes away if Lennart stops hacking.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
in some cases, you even have some people, who are PAID by some vendors,
agressively pushing GRATUITOUS, non compatible changes. I won't say names,
but you guys can fill the blanks in.
I'll fill in redhat, making upstream support even
Can you please provide a unified cvs diff?
I've not tried this patch but I have some comments (see below).
Useful for those times you want to use an unbound function, but even
when the function is bound to something you haven't memorized yet it
can be faster than lookup up the keybinding in
I haven't caught-up, nor reviewed anything else yet, but comments
inline:
On Tue 2012.11.06 at 16:11 +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
Can you please provide a unified cvs diff?
'cvs diff -uNp' is best...
[...]
for (iter = 0; iter nitems(name_to_kbfunc); iter++) {
- if
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
This is a mindset we need to fight, and this has to be a grass-roots
movement.
I agree with most of your statement, but for a grass-root movement you
will need to attract a lot of people. Otherwise you will move exactly
On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 16:45:17 +0100 (+0100), Lars von den Driesch wrote:
:If you want people to gain traction you will need to
:reduce some standards...
This is exactly what happened in Linux-land, and brought us to this
place in the first point.
--
Math is like love -- a simple idea but
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Lars von den Driesch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
This is a mindset we need to fight, and this has to be a grass-roots
movement.
I agree with most of your statement, but for a grass-root movement
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote:
On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 16:45:17 +0100 (+0100), Lars von den Driesch wrote:
This is exactly what happened in Linux-land, and brought us to this
place in the first point.
I know :-) And I understand this - but in
Hi Marc
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
So, hey, do whatever you want with that. Apart from the proverbial
curmudgeons,
there are LOTS of nice people in the OpenBSD developer community, who are
fairly open to a lot of stuff... I wouldn't be there if that
From your point of view everybody
is nice to you ;-)
I'm not!
Miod
Hey, dude-
Can you please provide a unified cvs diff?
The first patches I sent last week were cvs diffs, but I saw quilt
was recently added to ports to I switched to using it to manage all
of the patches (I have a few other things I'm working on, too, which
I haven't sent out for review yet).
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
Those vendors say we're not in the
Hey, dude-
I too would prefer to use nitems, to be consistent with the rest of the
code. Also reduces the number of gratuitous changes, and of course the
size of the diff.
I chose the guard element approach because it leads to the smallest diff,
but I can move the definition of
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:15:04PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
It could well end up the other way around, with systemd dying. It does
far too much and most of which is pointless in order to gain traction
but also limiting it's scope and so success unless it is forked or
radically changed of
I hear you on this, thinking about it I'd like to ask you what would be a
solution to this rather recurrent issue/problem we're facing from the Linux
side of the spectrum? What would be a solution or a framework that could
somehow negate most of the effects of this particular problem?. I grew up
Hi,
And here's a diff to repair ^, whcih now produces correct results for
things like
(dc)0.1 _1 ^p
or
(bc)0.1 ^ -1
The diff is against very current, so beware.
Please test. I have some regress test updates for dc as well. t9 turns
out to be a wrong test (computation of 2.1 ^ 500).
For people who are testing checksum-offload-enabling diffs, it would
help if you could say what sort of things have tested. Things like
fragments/NFS are far more likely to exercise bugs in the hardware
than standard web browsing.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:42:48PM +0100, TAKRIZ wrote:
I hear you on this, thinking about it I'd like to ask you what would be a
solution to this rather recurrent issue/problem we're facing from the Linux
side of the spectrum? What would be a solution or a framework that could
somehow negate
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:39:42 +0100
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
I don't have ANY KIND OF SOLUTION.
Certainly couldn't for that general problem without likely being the
problem.
As I've said before I'm not a Gnome fan and far from a Gnome 3 fan
however the reason udisks dropped many gnome
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Hi,
And here's a diff to repair ^, whcih now produces correct results for
things like
(dc)0.1 _1 ^p
or
(bc)0.1 ^ -1
The diff is against very current, so beware.
i've lightly tested it against gnu bc and it works
On 2012/11/05 13:57, Marc Espie wrote:
This stuff is totally a moving target, it is probably going to change in
the future.
Note that there are very good reasons to prefer pie binaries in MOST cases,
including for 'static' binaries...
So, as far as the chroot way goes, the most
I think this one is ready for wider testing.
How to use: hit tab in exec menu to complete the command (start
with / if you want something not in $PATH). When you're ready,
hit tab again. This will open file menu, which can be used to
complete file argument.
Completion works for other menus as
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
It's also quickly turning Posix and Unix into a travesty: either you have
the linux goodies, or you don't. And if you don't, you can forget anything
modern...
This IS the main problem.
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:38:32 +0100
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
They occupy a few people in our team FULLTIME with respect to gnome, they're
the reason we still DON'T have a full
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
They occupy a few people in our team FULLTIME with respect to gnome, they're
the reason we still DON'T have a full kde4 in our tree (hopefully to be
addressed shortly), and they're
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:49:12 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/11/05 13:57, Marc Espie wrote:
This stuff is totally a moving target, it is probably going to change in
the future.
Note that there are very good reasons to prefer pie binaries in MOST cases,
including for
* Alexander Polakov p...@sdf.org [121107 02:20]:
I think this one is ready for wider testing.
How to use: hit tab in exec menu to complete the command (start
with / if you want something not in $PATH). When you're ready,
hit tab again. This will open file menu, which can be used to
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:57:20PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Hi,
And here's a diff to repair ^, whcih now produces correct results for
things like
(dc)0.1 _1 ^p
or
(bc)0.1 ^ -1
The diff is against
07.11.2012 2:06 полÑзоваÑÐµÐ»Ñ Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com
напиÑал:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:38:32 +0100
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Basically, we have a pattern, mostly observed with kde (and a bit with
gnome) which is really harmful for us.
They occupy a few people
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:58:55AM +1100, Brett wrote:
Not to disparage the hard work by Antoine and others on Gnome and KDE, but if
upstream are going to entwine their code with non-standard OSs, then why
bother with them?
That _is_ precisely the question I asked on GNOME lists. I'm not
In my case,
it is a CARP backup(master will be upgraded soon) rolling ospf on top of gre on
top of ipsec, running npppd,
and daily NAT/RDR for about 100 clients.
On 6 nov 2012, at 21:31, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
For people who are testing checksum-offload-enabling diffs, it
43 matches
Mail list logo