On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:55:57PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
fix missing forward-slash.
Index: fstab.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/obsd/src/share/man/man5/fstab.5,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.48 fstab.5
---
2014-06-26 23:19 GMT+02:00, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org:
On 2014/06/26 20:20, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
As everybody noticed, there was another problem. Please update to
cvsync-0.25.0pre0p0 for the latest bug fix. Sorry for all the
inconvenience.
At least the following anoncvs
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:48:24 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko yasu...@yasuoka.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:35:07 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Followings are our kernel variables' default:
- sb_max: 256K
- tcbhash_size: 128
- udbhash_size: 128
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:01:23 -0700
From: Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:28:18PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
I just reviewed our mmap(2) flags to compare them against Linux,
FreeBSD, Solaris, and Darwin's flags. Of the flags listed below, none
of
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 21:54, Theo de Raadt wrote:
A better patch is probably the following which also increases the size
of the buffer to at least 64k:
Agreed.
One thing to be aware of. That function is syncronous. It will read
as much as it can get, then it will
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:28:18 -0700
From: Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org
I just reviewed our mmap(2) flags to compare them against Linux,
FreeBSD, Solaris, and Darwin's flags. Of the flags listed below, none
of them are specified by POSIX, and none of them do anything
interesting
Hi,
Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
It works with pf's divert-to to block some scanners. It's basically a
stripped-down spamd(8), that listens to every TCP connection that is
diverted to it, and sends the received data to the great bitbucket in
the sky, one byte per
On 2014/06/27 09:58, Leclerc, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
Not sure about base, but it may make sense to add to ports.
+/* Stolen from ftp-proxy */
Old version of ftp-proxy I guess. It hasn't used DIOCNATLOOK for several
releases, it has
De : Stuart Henderson [mailto:st...@openbsd.org]
On 2014/06/27 09:58, Leclerc, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
Not sure about base, but it may make sense to add to ports.
I'm not familiar with the creation of a port, but I'm willing to
* Leclerc, Sebastien sebastien.lecl...@saint-georges.ca [2014-06-27 16:40]:
+ if (ioctl(pfdev, DIOCNATLOOK, pnl) == -1)
no
DIOCNATLOOK is stupid. I'll celebrate the day when I can kill it.
Please look at less ancient
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 02:46:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Losing the descriptions of the no-op flags is a bit unfortunate.
Can you add those back?
Okay, restored them below. Also tested that kdump can handle this
change gracefully.
In this diff I've also moved MAP_FILE down to the legacy
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org, 2014-06-27 11:00
+/* Stolen from ftp-proxy */
Old version of ftp-proxy I guess. It hasn't used DIOCNATLOOK for several
releases, it has switched to the much easier-to-use divert-to / getsockname().
And also :
Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de,
MAP_HASSEMAPHORE is used in rthread_sem.c, but it doesn't do anything,
so I suspect it's just cargo culting based on man page misinformation?
Are there architectures that actually have restrictions on semaphore
memory?
There architectures where atomic instructions only work on pages
13 matches
Mail list logo
