On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:55 -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
OK but size_t should be printed %zu (%zd is ssize_t).
- todd
Obviously not that trivial: The return type of sizeof() is size_t, which
is unsigned, thus the second conversion specification should be %zu.
(The printf manpage notes that the %zd conversion indicates that the
argument is of a signed type equivalent in size to a size_t.).
natano
On Mon, Feb 09,
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:34:20 -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
This makes it easier for a sysadmin to diagnose a privilege separation
path problem without looking at the source code for why 'stat' failed.
OK but when printing stb.st_mode you should AND it with ALLPERMS
so you don't print non-user bits.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:32:55PM -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
Well, if it is size_t, it should be %zu.
Joerg
On Feb 10, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:55 -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
OK but size_t should be printed %zu (%zd is ssize_t).
- todd
If I had known I would get so many emails over this, I
I already talked to dlg here, but that obviously cuts you out which
isn't good :/
* Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net [2015-02-10 23:12]:
We do not use the pf congestion feature, we have disabled it with
an #ifdef. Prefering states over rules means that you cannot login
into a congested
The way to get attention around here is show diffs :)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:51 AM, aixtools aixto...@gmail.com wrote:
L.S.,
Trying for a bit over a week to gt a response re: libressl.
1) If you have a established mailing-list for libressl - I did not find it.
That of course says
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Sebastian's emails don't make it to the list, but in the interest of
transparency and not hiding any secrets about OpenBSD's security, I'm
forwarding it along as requested.
Uff. Another one who forgot to get his meds...
Hi!
Theo, Henning, and me developed an idea to utilize TLS in some way for
authenticated time in ntpd(8). We are not intending to use it as a
direct time source, but as a constraint to verify the NTP responses.
I came up with an implementation that has been designed to be an
optional,
On 2015-02-10 9:55 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
The way to get attention around here is show diffs :)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:51 AM, aixtoolsaixto...@gmail.com wrote:
L.S.,
Trying for a bit over a week to gt a response re: libressl.
1) If you have a established mailing-list for libressl - I did
Well.. there are issues with that both if you require libraries, and
are not certain how the other stuff works. In short, we
have to be a lot more careful than this and we can't depend on
external libraries.
Ideally, for us to deal with this we'd need an decent AIX running
machine with OS and
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:55:53 +0100
Reyk Floeter wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely deployed.
When ntpd acts as a server, could the package signing code be of use
with ntpd keys?
On 2015/02/10 12:32, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Let me share the answer to a question that I got in a private mail:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:55:53AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
---snip---
servers pool.ntp.org
constraints from https://www.google.com/search?q=openntpd;
Cue google turning on
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:03:27 +
David Dahlberg wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely deployed.
When ntpd acts as a server, could the package signing code be of use
with ntpd keys?
How exactly? You
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:51:12PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So I gave Reyk some beer, and he did the impossible :-)
I sense a pattern here.
Reyk
On 11 Feb 2015, at 8:12 am, Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:01:19PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i want to remove the congestion stuff in ifqueue, but i dont want
to remove the pf functionality. my attempt at this below.
I like that you replaced
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:51:12PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So I gave Reyk some beer, and he did the impossible :-)
I sense a pattern here.
Reyk
Not enough samples to be a pattern yet.. You shouldn't worry..
It's
* Henning Brauer hb-openbsdt...@ml.bsws.de [2015-02-10 13:21]:
* Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk [2015-02-10 13:14]:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:55:53 +0100
Reyk Floeter wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely
* Henning Brauer hb-openbsdt...@ml.bsws.de [2015-02-10 13:21]:
* Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk [2015-02-10 13:14]:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:55:53 +0100
Reyk Floeter wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:01:19PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i want to remove the congestion stuff in ifqueue, but i dont want
to remove the pf functionality. my attempt at this below.
I like that you replaced the malloc and timeout with a ticks
comparison as it makes the code simpler. The
Brent Cook wrote:
On Feb 10, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:55 -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
OK but size_t should be printed %zu (%zd is ssize_t).
- todd
If I had known I would
Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2015, 12:35 + schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:55:53 +0100
Reyk Floeter wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely deployed.
When ntpd acts as a server, could the package
* Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk [2015-02-10 13:14]:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:55:53 +0100
Reyk Floeter wrote:
The standardized attempts to add authentication to NTP are a) fairly
horrible (ASN.1 etc.) and b) rarely deployed.
When ntpd acts as a server, could the package signing code be
Brent Cook wrote:
On Feb 10, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:55 -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
OK but size_t should be printed %zu (%zd is ssize_t).
- todd
If I had
24 matches
Mail list logo
