On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:32PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25 schrieb Todd
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:46:15AM +, Florian Obser wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:32PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:37:27PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:46:17AM -0400, dan mclaughlin wrote:
i figure this should be useful to some.
any nits welcome.
Unfortunately, this will become
Hi,
Any idea why don't we support filtering the show states output
by the associated rule number?
Diff below works fine here, OK?
Index: pfctl.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.329
diff -u -p
Mike Belopuhov(m...@belopuhov.com) on 2015.06.09 16:23:04 +0200:
Hi,
Any idea why don't we support filtering the show states output
by the associated rule number?
indeed, why not?
Diff below works fine here, OK?
ok!
Index: pfctl.c
Hi,
Please review SNMP bits for the new 'no-route' pf state insertion
failure counter. Any improvements to the MIB description? Here's
what I mean by no target addresses were available: for instance,
with such ruleset:
table empty persist
pass in on vmx0 inet proto tcp to port 80 route-to
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 18:11 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Hi,
I was surprised to see 'State Creations' rule counter go up when
I've just realised that I might have been a bit too vague in my
description.
no real state creation happens.
Should read: when state creation/insertion fails.
Our current base compiler will abort with an error if it finds a typedef
being redefined, even if the new definition is no different from the one
it knows about.
Allowing this kind of type redefinition is a new C11 feature, which some
third-party software has already started using. Moreover,
Hi,
I was surprised to see 'State Creations' rule counter go up when
no real state creation happens. This is because we increment all
counters too early, but then don't decrement 'states_tot' which
is a total number of states created by the rule. Not entirely
sure why was it done but I see no
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 17:52 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Hi,
Please review SNMP bits for the new 'no-route' pf state insertion
failure counter. Any improvements to the MIB description? Here's
what I mean by no target addresses were available: for instance,
with such ruleset:
table
Hi,
I start reading libc/locale code in order to understanding it.
Here a patch to remove an unused argument isspecial from static
function load_locale_sub.
The function is called once, with isspecial=0, and the argument isn't
used in function's body.
Any comments ?
--
Sébastien Marie
Hello tech@
delete case '?': /* FALLTHROUGH */ where it is already handled
by default: usage();.
Rarely also adjust getopt(3)'s optstring.
Index: bin/pax/options.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/pax/options.c,v
retrieving revision
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
I start reading libc/locale code in order to understanding it.
Here a patch to remove an unused argument isspecial from static
function load_locale_sub.
The function is called once, with isspecial=0, and the argument
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:46:20PM +0200, Benjamin Baier wrote:
Hello tech@
delete case '?': /* FALLTHROUGH */ where it is already handled
by default: usage();.
Not quite sure it is correct to remove the '?' case from
npppd.c, since there is no 'default' case.
Also, if the idea is to
On 10 Jun 2015, at 07:43, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
OK?
yep.
diff --git share/man/man9/Makefile share/man/man9/Makefile
index d145186..c63132f 100644
--- share/man/man9/Makefile
+++ share/man/man9/Makefile
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ MAN= aml_evalnode.9 atomic_add_int.9
ok.
On 10 Jun 2015, at 07:42, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
OK?
diff --git sys/kern/kern_clock.c sys/kern/kern_clock.c
index 279804c..e35f2f4 100644
--- sys/kern/kern_clock.c
+++ sys/kern/kern_clock.c
@@ -200,63 +200,10 @@ hardclock(struct clockframe *frame)
if
ok.
On 10 Jun 2015, at 07:41, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
OK?
diff --git sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
index 9edd615..a4a279f 100644
--- sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
+++ sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
@@ -1003,13 +1003,13 @@ tryagain:
error =
ok.
On 10 Jun 2015, at 07:41, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
OK?
diff --git sys/net/if_bridge.c sys/net/if_bridge.c
index 637dea8..ce8d0d7 100644
--- sys/net/if_bridge.c
+++ sys/net/if_bridge.c
@@ -2181,11 +2181,10 @@ int
bridge_ipsec(struct bridge_softc *sc, struct ifnet
OK?
diff --git sys/kern/kern_clock.c sys/kern/kern_clock.c
index 279804c..e35f2f4 100644
--- sys/kern/kern_clock.c
+++ sys/kern/kern_clock.c
@@ -200,63 +200,10 @@ hardclock(struct clockframe *frame)
if (timeout_hardclock_update())
softintr_schedule(softclock_si);
}
/*
OK?
diff --git sys/net/if_bridge.c sys/net/if_bridge.c
index 637dea8..ce8d0d7 100644
--- sys/net/if_bridge.c
+++ sys/net/if_bridge.c
@@ -2181,11 +2181,10 @@ int
bridge_ipsec(struct bridge_softc *sc, struct ifnet *ifp,
struct ether_header *eh, int hassnap, struct llc *llc,
int dir, int
OK?
diff --git sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
index 9edd615..a4a279f 100644
--- sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
+++ sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c
@@ -1003,13 +1003,13 @@ tryagain:
error = fxdr_unsigned(int, *tl);
if ((nmp-nm_flag NFSMNT_NFSV3)
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:01:01 -0700
patrick keshishian sids...@boxsoft.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:46:20PM +0200, Benjamin Baier wrote:
Hello tech@
delete case '?': /* FALLTHROUGH */ where it is already handled
by default: usage();.
Not quite sure it is correct to
OK?
diff --git share/man/man9/Makefile share/man/man9/Makefile
index d145186..c63132f 100644
--- share/man/man9/Makefile
+++ share/man/man9/Makefile
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ MAN=aml_evalnode.9 atomic_add_int.9
atomic_cas_uint.9 \
copy.9 config_attach.9 crypto.9 delay.9 \
Hi,
Noticed a regression with vi and recent changes to timespec
data types.
To reproduce, run vi without a file name to edit. Try save buffer
via :w and you'll be presented by following message:
file modified more recently than this this copy; use ! to override
Patch below fixes this.
Hope
24 matches
Mail list logo